tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-165686322024-03-07T15:22:44.987-05:00Deliver RantsI Blog Therefore I am.NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16568632.post-50307606246257726692018-01-24T12:09:00.001-05:002018-01-24T12:09:33.273-05:00Not My Reality<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">So I have a theory...<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIRAuS3uoRMZa6aPrjdQoFRMICCSAwU5uWirx9TJ2dh0Y1HqRjwExIVU9d8Xj2esn-_YqWntZhfMzYQpeyXSKtI5q4XA6-gTej_jMHZxOj4cQfKHdcqAzfDFuK_cgn2Zi3oLYP/s1600/trump.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><img border="0" data-original-height="320" data-original-width="600" height="170" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIRAuS3uoRMZa6aPrjdQoFRMICCSAwU5uWirx9TJ2dh0Y1HqRjwExIVU9d8Xj2esn-_YqWntZhfMzYQpeyXSKtI5q4XA6-gTej_jMHZxOj4cQfKHdcqAzfDFuK_cgn2Zi3oLYP/s320/trump.jpg" width="320" /></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">I see a direct correlation in the timeline between:<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">·<span style="font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal;"> </span>The complete disregard and dismissal of reason<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">·<span style="font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><!--[endif]--> The birth of 'alternative facts'<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">·<span style="font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"> The school-yard-like knee-jerk labeling of
"FAKE NEWS FAKE NEWS" to ANYTHING that anyone does not WANT to be
true (or at least not reported as true) <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">·<span style="font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><span style="font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal;"> T</span>he complete dumbing down of America<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">AND ...<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">'Reality' Television<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Putting aside for a moment that our clueless leader was
himself, a reality TV Star ...<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">This so-called reality of reality television IS 'fake news' and it is an 'alternative' reality.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">I don't get it. I don't know why someone would come home
from a hard and stressful day and not want to relax with a good old-fashioned
sitcom. Instead they watch cat-fight shouting matches and the manufactured
'drama' of producer-induced/goaded neo-celebrities flipping tables over and
spewing anger.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">I get it from the TV BUSINESS side of it. Yeah it's great we
have HUNDREDS of television stations now. But more choice just means more bad
television to choose from. But alas, all those stations means they need a whole
LOT of programming to fill that air time and by far, the two cheapest ways to
fill that are ... infomercials of how to get a Brazilian Butt for example,
Penis Enlargement (sugar) pills and The Best Bra ever) and then of course the
other cheap air filler - reality television.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Reality television requires no writers, no scripts, no
THOUGHT. Just pay (peanuts at first) to a generation of fame-seekers who would
do anything for their 15 minutes - hand pick them to get the best combination
of unlikeable morons to go at each other and
... your work is done here.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">I get it. America come home from work and wants something
'mindless' so they don't have to think about their jobs, their spouse, their
kids, the growing gap between the impoverished and the super rich etc. Mindless
entertainment is nothing new. It's was Dwayne Johnson movies exist. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">But we always knew this form of entertainment was FICTION.
Now... I'm not so sure we know that as we should.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">There was a prevailing theory many years ago, that if all
there was on television was opera, Shakespeare and ballet, that people WOULD
watch it because there was no other choice, I don't know if I believe that to
be true as this theory came along long before the advent of the internet (and
free porn).<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">But surely there is a middle ground of watchable
entertainment somewhere between Othello and Duck Dynasty?<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">So we are collectively dumber as a nation as near as I can
tell, seem happy to be so. We deserve what we get because WE THE PEOPLE allow
it to happen. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Not only do we like being dumb, it has led to a distrust of
those who ARE intelligent, educated and rational. Hysterically, the right
called Obama (a black man) an 'elitist' simply because he went to Harvard Law
School.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Yeah sure ... Goof 'Ole "W" went to Yale but come
on ... he got in because his Daddy went there and we're pretty sure Ole W was
only there to party. We knew W was not the sharpest knife in the drawer but hey
... he was a guy you could sit down with at the diner and share a beer and some
meatloaf with. Well that's very nice. But the kind of guy I could enjoy a
brewski and the diner special with is the kind of guy I would want to go to the
diner with ... not run my country.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Trump often uses all 87 words he know to claim to be the
smartest, most ejamacated genius since Einstein - in factor smarter probably -
Einstein never had a TV show, a fake university or his own airplane.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">But middle America did not vote for him based on his
intelligence or there lack of, they voted for him because he was a regular guy
billionaire (multi-millionaire more like) who wore a baseball hat just like the
rest of us in the trailer park.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">We knew Trump waned to run America like a business. We just
didn’t know he was going to run it like one of HIS businesses.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">The conservative write George WIll recently said (and I
paraphrase) that he hopes there is no impeachment because he wants Trump to
serve out all four years. Because WE voted for him (at least in an electoral
college sense) and that we NEED to experience all four years of Trump so that
we are never ever ever tempted to vote so stupidly again.</span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">Don't Agree? Get your own blog!</div>NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16568632.post-45594603389226459752014-07-10T16:13:00.000-04:002014-07-10T16:33:46.408-04:00There's a Soccer Born Every Minute<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-The9WgPGvdo/U77qckZ8I6I/AAAAAAABC9k/MEkJVqvTXrI/s1600/article-0-1EB4F36800000578-963_964x639.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-The9WgPGvdo/U77qckZ8I6I/AAAAAAABC9k/MEkJVqvTXrI/s320/article-0-1EB4F36800000578-963_964x639.jpg" height="132" width="200" /></a>With apologies to all who call it football, futbol or ‘the beautiful game', I am writing today (after a brief five year hiatus) about soccer, as World Cup 2014 is about to come to merciful conclusion.<br />
<br />
So the Spanish disappointed, as did the Italians, and yet again the English. The Americans were OK but never a legitimate threat. But soccer skill and acumen is apparently plentiful in the German DNA.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately for the team from Germany though, German DNA has also been plentiful in Argentina since about 1945. How painful it must be for the English to watch a final, rooting against BOTH teams.<br />
<br />
Much like the Olympics, I looked forward to the tournament at the start but within a week was thinking, “when will this thing be OVER?”<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Q8YNdgucbss/U77qhOlVRCI/AAAAAAABC-U/bOplWBY-gtg/s1600/soccer_ball_russian_flag_binder-r29301ec91cb34834a319a10e5154ef39_xz8md_8byvr_512.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Q8YNdgucbss/U77qhOlVRCI/AAAAAAABC-U/bOplWBY-gtg/s320/soccer_ball_russian_flag_binder-r29301ec91cb34834a319a10e5154ef39_xz8md_8byvr_512.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a>Now we can look forward to the next World Cup in four years in Russia. And we can be thankful … thankful that it is not for another four years.<br />
<br />
Apart from taproom owners who enjoyed an increase in mid-afternoon drinking, the World Cup is generally greeted in America with the enthusiasm one reserves for C-SPAN highlights. I’m not saying that soccer is devoid of devotees in America. Indeed an entire generation has now grown up playing the sport.<br />
<br />
When I was a kid, if you drove around on any given Spring or Summer Saturday morning, you would invariable hear the ‘ping’ of aluminum striking a baseball coming from the nearest little league field. Now on Saturday mornings you only hear the moans of a diving soccer youth lobbying for a foul call.<br />
<br />
But as adults, soccer can never penetrate our mainstream. It’s not because soccer is as boring as some make out a nil-nil draw to be. Indeed there are strategy and tactics to observe if one is roughly acquainted with the off-sides rule or the difference between a direct and an indirect free kick.<br />
<br />
The reason soccer will never be the new NFL is two-fold.
Firstly, the sport has one statistic. Goals scored. Far as I can tell, that’s it. Can’t lead to much excitement for a ‘fantasy soccer’ league with one lousy statistic.
<br />
<br />
But more importantly, the clock never stops. No stoppage in the action means no commercial breaks. No commercial breaks means no commercials. No commercials mean no commercial revenue. No commercial revenue means no television. No television means no interest.
In England, soccer is broadcast on the BBC (a non-commercial, state-funded network).<br />
<br />
Soccer is king in England. They invented the bloody sport for one thing. They even managed to win the World Cup … once … a LONG time ago … back when the ball was made of stone I think.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uWu3Z0HDwzE/U77qdaD796I/AAAAAAABC9w/k00QLadZ8w8/s1600/blog_caveman_soccer1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uWu3Z0HDwzE/U77qdaD796I/AAAAAAABC9w/k00QLadZ8w8/s320/blog_caveman_soccer1.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">That's Got to Hurt</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
I am confused though.
In the Olympics, England competes ... not as England ... not even as The UK ... but as Team Great Britain and Northern Ireland ... which is by the way what the UK is … The United Kingdom of Great Britain (meaning England, Scotland and Wales) and Northern Ireland.<br />
<br />
But in soccer, theoretically at least, England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland could each qualify for the World Cup. So this potentially could increase the chances of a UK team winning four-fold as opposed the one squad they ship to the Olympics.
Given the (lack of) success of those four countries though, would it not be in their interest to compete as one nation and draw from a larger pool of talent?<br />
<br />
I mean, you see only one USA team on the soccer field (pitch, ground whatever you want to call it). You don’t hear them say, “Well South Carolina has qualified by knocking out Iowa. But Montana continues to struggle in their match with Delaware.”<br />
<br />
I do admit a certain geo-political ignorance to international sports competition. For example, in the group stages round of the World Cup, I heard that Iran lost, 3-1 to Bosnia and Herzegovina. And I thought, “well no wonder they lost. Iran had to play against Bosnia AND Herzegovina. That hardly seems fair. At least let Bosnia and Herzegovina play against someone like Trinidad AND Tobago. That sounds at least more balanced.”<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
So now the World Cup moves on to Russia in 2018. Russia, the country that hosted the Winter Olympics in a SUMMER resort town, that actually had to BUY snow and have it delivered to Sochi.<br />
<br />
Seriously though , I do wish the Russians well. This will be the first World Cup hosted in Eastern Europe. And that alone, is pretty exciting stuff.<br />
<br />
Perhaps they can re-purpose that one stubborn Olympic ring that wouldn’t light up and make it into a soccer ball.<br />
<br />
They are building many new stadiums across the country for this. And that will be great news for some local economies. In an effort to minimize travel though, they are only using venues west of the Urals. So sorry Vladivostok, no new stadium for you.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
They are building a stadium in the city of Samara though. Samara is a large though little known (outside of Russia) city on the Volga and one that I have a special place for in my heart. It is hometown to my wife and my wonderful extended family. I have been there twice … once in summer … once in winter. Like Napoleon before me, when it comes to Russia, I recommend the summer.<br />
<br />
The only question that remains though, is who will Russia invade immediately following the World Cup? The Ukraine? No … been there … done that. That’s so 2014.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Py73-FzJ_oE/U77qedrLx8I/AAAAAAABC98/5EyN8U_uUMw/s1600/lFpjPJihTiuRT8IQsKVP_sleeping_with_one_eye_open.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Py73-FzJ_oE/U77qedrLx8I/AAAAAAABC98/5EyN8U_uUMw/s320/lFpjPJihTiuRT8IQsKVP_sleeping_with_one_eye_open.jpg" height="149" width="200" /></a>Hmmm… I like the idea of them invading Germany for a little payback. Might be biting off a little more than they could chew though. The whole Germany being part of NATO thing is sure not to go unnoticed. No. It’ll probably be something smaller, closer to home and easier to gloss over.<br />
<br />
Sleep with one eye open Belarus!
</div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">Don't Agree? Get your own blog!</div>NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16568632.post-42304042694862331072009-06-09T14:31:00.011-04:002009-06-11T13:37:14.050-04:00Nothing Super About Supermarkets<div style="text-align: justify;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Si69CKfmpSI/AAAAAAAAARI/-LmTW8WCuZs/s1600-h/selfcheckout.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Si69CKfmpSI/AAAAAAAAARI/-LmTW8WCuZs/s320/selfcheckout.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5345417652609656098" border="0" /></a><meta equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11"><meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 11"><link style="font-family: arial;" rel="File-List" href="file:///C:%5CDOCUME%7E1%5CUser%5CLOCALS%7E1%5CTemp%5Cmsohtml1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>Normal</w:View> <w:zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:punctuationkerning/> <w:validateagainstschemas/> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables/> <w:snaptogridincell/> <w:wraptextwithpunct/> <w:useasianbreakrules/> <w:dontgrowautofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:browserlevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><style> <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><meta equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11"><meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 11"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>Normal</w:View> <w:zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:punctuationkerning/> <w:validateagainstschemas/> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables/> <w:snaptogridincell/> <w:wraptextwithpunct/> <w:useasianbreakrules/> <w:dontgrowautofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:browserlevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><style> <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--><span style="font-family:Arial;">Almost all "Super” markets have now installed loads of self-checkout lanes where you can scan, pay and bag without the assistance of an employee. Great ...right?</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">Not so fast (Literally).<o:p></o:p></span><u1:p></u1:p></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /></span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">Good luck trying to figure out whether your fresh produce was organic, large, loose, or any other description (so always just select the cheapest and play dumb if questioned on the way out).
<br /></span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">Every other item scanned - if you can get the scanner to recognize the bar code - will be followed by a message to "wait for assistance" - an ordeal requiring some after-school-working, nose-picking samsonite monkey to mosey over at their convenience (think "continental drift") … who invariably will need to call the assistant manager for "the key".</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">Don't kid yourself. This was not some kind-hearted attempt by the stores to give you a more hands-on experience or in ANY way speed your checkout. This is solely a way for them to cut down on employee’s wages and health benefits ... much like <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">ATMS</span> have greatly reduced bank payrolls to give the banks even more money to buy worthless mortgage-backed securities.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>What you think was about $80 worth of groceries will end up be closer to $200 since in every aisle you can never figure out which of the 8 price stickers on the shelf applies to the 28 products shelved above (or is it below?) them.</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">There’s always some smart arse who is in the queue whilst his/her partner continues to shop … dropping items off into their cart every few minutes or so and then dashing off for something else.</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><u1:p><span style="font-family:Arial;"> <o:p></o:p></span></u1:p></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">The innumerate lummox in front of you thinks you haven’t noticed he has 27 products in the ‘express’ lane. And a <span style="font-style: italic;">OK-Magazine</span>-reading octomom with bored brats has given up and let them cry, whine and generally run amok with their destructive behaviour now being measured in kilotons.</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">After watching the befuddled rocket scientist in front of you finally manage to scan all his goods, that process will be followed by excruciating minutes of watching him scan all 542 of his “buy 20 get one free” coupons. (<b style="">Note</b>: folks you <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">ain</span>’t saving money if you buy more than you need!). And then trying to stuff those coupons into the machine will take longer than the cooking time of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">all</span> his products combined.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><u1:p><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>When I was a kid, I had a job stocking shelves in a supermarket AT NIGHT - WHEN THE STORE WAS CLOSED. Now they stock during open hours, blocking the aisles with massive dollies of processed crap and then they (the courtesy-challenged employees) give YOU (the customer) a dirty look when you ask them to move.<o:p></o:p></span><u1:p></u1:p></u1:p></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /></span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">When you do check out with an actual cashier, there is always some blue-haired fossil ahead of you who actually seems startled by the fact that there is to be money involved in this transaction ... then goes hunting through his/her (but c'mon, we really know I mean HER) purse ...trying to find the exact change. <o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>"<i>Wait ... I think I have the 93 cents</i>" - (TIP) If the cents part is over 50 cents, there is no value in finding the exact coins. Find the pennies to round it off to a 5 or 10 cent figure and then return every tissue you have ever used back into your carry-on-sized handbag. To pass the time, you try to guess who was president when she was born and decide it was probably Roosevelt (Teddy).</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">Today there were 15 people ahead of me in line; all with products that had incorrect bar-coded pricing (some of those products were probably not even from that supermarket's inventory). They all had no ID and wanted to pay with out-of-state starter checks. It was the cashier's first day on the job and she did not speak English.
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>But no matter how long it takes to do all my grocery shopping, wait in line at the deli, find everything on my list and check out ... it STILL always takes longer than that whole ordeal when you stop at the "customer service" (<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">hahaha</span>) counter on the way out?<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>There is usually one or less people (teen aged dolt) "working" there who devotes more attention to the customers on the phone than the ones ALREADY IN the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">freakin</span>' shop. He/she can never find <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">anyone's</span> developed photos in less than an hour, has to page the manager for every transaction, can't find or figure out how to use the key that unlocks the glass cigar case, spends most of his/her time hiding in the back and has the IQ of sewage and the attention span of an <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">opiated</span> lab rat.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>Then there is always one semi-evolved knuckle-dragger holding up the works because they want to check six hundred individual lottery tickets to see if they have a winner and then purchase 600 more ... each one some specialized specific combination of numbers (<i>"Then one daily number, 6-3-8 ... 50 cents boxed, a dollar straight ...then 1 daily number 8-4-2 ... a dollar boxed .... One pick four 1-6-4-5 ... blah blah blah."</i>)<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>And when they don't have Pall Mall Extra Light Menthol 100s in the soft pack, there is always some tar-lunged nimrod who then can't decide on a second choice of smokes. (This is usually the same guy who takes 40 minutes to specify the mix of flavors/varieties of a dozen artery-choking treats at the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Dunkin</span> Donuts).<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>And yes, there is always some socially-parasitic mouth-breather with limited language skills and body odor that could choke a rhino, trying to return an already-mostly-consumed item for some stupid reason like "the ratio of marshmallow clovers was too small compared to those bland <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">untasty</span> bits in my <i>Lucky Charms </i>cereal."</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">As a conscientious and intelligent member of society, you begin to feel woefully out of place; like Debra Messing in a Russ Meyer film.
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;">
<br /><u1:p></u1:p>And to top it all off, the line is dominated by acne-plagued employees seeking to cash their minimum wage checks or purchase some item with their 0.3% employee discount. And all I want is ONE <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">freakin</span> scratch off!</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;"><span style=""> </span>Watch in amazement as the non-functioning bottom feeder in front of you can’t figure out how to swipe their ATM card because instead of focusing on the task at hand, they are yammering on their cell phone.</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">
<br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;"> “No I <i>like</i> got the small mushy peas in the can instead of <i>like</i> the fresh ones because mom likes the water in the cans. They <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">didn</span>’t have tofu burgers. And<span style="font-style: italic;"> like</span> … I got <i>Trix</i> instead because <i>like </i>there are never enough marshmallow bits in the Lucky Charms. So anyway, I heard that<i> like</i> Marcie likes Dave. Are you <i>like</i> going to Courtney’s party?…. Blah blah blah”<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><p style="text-align: justify;"></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">Don't Agree? Get your own blog!</div>NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16568632.post-87425604726989302472007-07-19T13:46:00.000-04:002007-07-24T16:59:52.316-04:00America's Biggest Losers - TV Watchers!<div align="justify"><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_VN96XpZI/AAAAAAAAAJ0/2wecX09kiuM/s1600-h/pleasestandby.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089020539886347666" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_VN96XpZI/AAAAAAAAAJ0/2wecX09kiuM/s200/pleasestandby.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"> </span><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="font-family:arial;">Sorry for the prolonged absence. It was down to technical difficulties. That being that life gets in the way of blogging and all that. And whilst there are many topics to rant about … having tackled children’s television last time, it is time to turn my attention and wrath towards so-called adult-television.<br /><br />I don’t mean “Adult” television as in trying to play ‘beat-the-clock’ during your 5-minute ‘free-view’ of “Spankovision” … though frankly, the insidious lack of socially redeeming material is not limited to cable porn.<br /><br />The ‘plots’ of some really bad porn stories are actually better developed and thought out than the wafer-thin offerings on so-called conventional television these days.<br /></span></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089018796129625458" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 101px; HEIGHT: 150px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="150" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_Tod6XpXI/AAAAAAAAAJk/EeijJBxoHkI/s200/smashyourTV.gif" width="67" border="0" /><span style="color:#000000;">When we returned from five years of living in England, I welcomed the return to where prime time television was not monopolized by – I kid you not – hours of …often consecutive nights of - darts tournaments and snooker!</span><br /></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088966917219656482" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-kct6XoyI/AAAAAAAAAE8/-YzORN_92gM/s320/snooker.jpg" border="0" /> <span style="color:#000000;"></span></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">I tried to get into watching snooker but was eternally confused by a woman on one of Britain’s gazillion ‘fashion’ TV shows who said that “brown was this year’s black.”</span><br /></span><a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_OAt6XpPI/AAAAAAAAAIk/qACdCOKldHc/s1600-h/darts.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089012615671686386" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px" height="224" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_OAt6XpPI/AAAAAAAAAIk/qACdCOKldHc/s200/darts.jpg" width="193" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><span style="color:#000000;">And don’t get me started on darts. Fat guys in polo shirts participating </span><span style="color:#000000;">in a pub game hardly constitutes athletics</span> <span style="color:#000000;">in my book. So imagine my surprise to come back to America and see TV over-run with a plethora of competitive eating and poker tournaments! </span><br /></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;">Poker? TV has gotten so bad that we consider watching people playing cards to be entertainment? Strip poker maybe … but poker? Why not Old Maid or Go Fish? Oops, I may have inadvertently given an idea (undoubtedly their first) to TV “programming” executives.</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">I remember the excitement at the advent of cable TV in the 1980s … and dawn of all the new TV stations. 900 channels? WOW! Now there will ALWAYS be something good on!<br /><br />Remember thinking that?<br /><br />The 24-hour Fishing Channel!!!! Sounds riveting! I wanna be the first one in the trailer park to have it!<br /><br />Alas … WE WERE WARNED.</span><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">I recall the “experts” predicting that all those stations will have 24 hours per day of airtime to fill and it wasn’t exactly like the quality of TV was going to improve! It was not about quality. It was quantity baby!<br /><br />Air time to fill? Why not use FILLER? Appeal to the late night lowest common denominator with infomercials and Infotainment.<br /><br />Lord knows there are enough bad horror movies and nymphotainment/soft core porn to air (not that there’s anything wrong with that).</span><br /><br /><span style="color:#000000;">It about the year 2000 when I realized that ‘Gore vs. Bush’ wasn’t just a presidential race but an accurate description of your Friday night choices on Showtime and Cinemax. </span></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089265546295748018" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/RqC0DN6XpbI/AAAAAAAAAKE/_hFnOQ24qOM/s200/colorbars.jpg" border="0" /> </span><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">And just who would sponsor this fluff? Phone Sex Chat hotlines of course!</span> </span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088969343876178802" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-mp96Xo3I/AAAAAAAAAFk/AlditqsDY1U/s200/lie_girls.jpg" border="0" /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Hands up anyone who thinks those gorgeous models in lingerie chatting on the phone look the same as the actual females who use those lines! Millions must. Such is the power of TV.<br /><br />Combine those revenues with the cash cow of the daytime plethora of “have you been injured on the job” ambulance-chasers … and then cap the ‘production’ costs of the actual programming to the equivalent of the daily take of a child’s lemonade stand … and you too can become the next Ted Turner!</span><br /><br /></span><a href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-m-d6Xo4I/AAAAAAAAAFs/DoH6Z7cxH-w/s1600-h/articleoldtelevision.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088969696063497090" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-m-d6Xo4I/AAAAAAAAAFs/DoH6Z7cxH-w/s200/articleoldtelevision.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Incidentally, doesn’t it seem odd that the invention of television (delayed by World War II) took ages after the invention of radio because of the limited technology of the day in an effort to</span><span style="color:#000000;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">B-R-O-A-D-C-A-S-T the signal?<br /><br />After all the toil and sweat of perfecting the system, we then regress the process into a (cable) wire-to-wire system? Hell, we could’ve done that in the first place and skipped all the time figuring out how to send the signal through the airwaves?</span><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">That would be the equivalent of say … the Romans inventing the aqueduct, vastly improving the lives of people by bringing water directly to their homes, and then dismissing that in favor of buying bottled water! Oh wait, that’s been done too.<br /><br /><em>Here I go sounding like my dad but …</em></span><br /><br /></span><div align="justify"></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">When I was a kid …<br /><br />We had three VHF stations; the network affiliates (CBS, ABC and NBC. Fox didn’t exist yet). We had three UHF local stations showing a mix of ‘classic’ syndicated reruns like <em>I Love Lucy</em>, <em>Gilligan’s Island</em> and <em>The Munsters</em> along with some kids programming and local sports. And there was one PBS station. And that was it. </span><br /></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088977186486461410" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-tyd6Xo-I/AAAAAAAAAGc/hW_TbiS3gbc/s200/networks.JPG" border="0" /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Ask anyone under the age of 30 what UHF and VHF are and they’ll look at you like you just asked George Bush to define the concept of having an exit strategy.<br /><br />Oh and if you missed your favorite show you had to wait until it was rerun in the summer (repeat season) because there were no VCRs, DVDs, DVRs, etc. Just what the hell is a podcast anyway?</span><br /><br /></span><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-uv96Xo_I/AAAAAAAAAGk/_K_xE6wjbcQ/s1600-h/test+pattern.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088978243048416242" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-uv96Xo_I/AAAAAAAAAGk/_K_xE6wjbcQ/s200/test+pattern.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;">And you know what? IF they had nothing good to air, they simply shut down overnight and ran a test pattern until the next morning. There’s an idea worth revisiting!<br /><br />WE had ONE [black and white] TV in the whole household when I was a kid but it was (for the time) a ‘big screen’ with a whopping 25 inches!</span><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">I recall (in the late 1960s) getting up at 6 AM as a small boy and waiting for the National Anthem to play, indicating “the start of our broadcast day” which was then followed by a half-hour of some guy in a suit teaching sentence structure, or the alphabet or something kind of lame, followed by <em>Dennis the Menace</em>.</span><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">The urban skyline was dotted with television antennae. It looks the same now; only the elongated twisted metal antennae have been replaced with circular and oval Tivo and DirecTV dishes.<br /></span><br /></span><a href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-xIN6XpAI/AAAAAAAAAGs/dryIHrylbL8/s1600-h/sneakers.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088980858683499522" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 223px; HEIGHT: 100px" height="207" alt="" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-xIN6XpAI/AAAAAAAAAGs/dryIHrylbL8/s200/sneakers.jpg" width="276" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Back in the day, the urban landscape almost inexplicably included countless pairs of old sneakers tied together by the laces and flung up in the air until they dangled from utility wires over the street.<br /></span><br /><span style="color:#000000;">Hey why not … back then I think a pair of sneakers cost like 49 cents or something … not like today where you have to take a “one-time lump-sum (involving the deduction of outrageously predatory and exorbitant fees) on your annuity or structured settlement” in order to get your Nikes. Throw them over a phone line? What are you kidding?</span><br /></span><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-xv96XpBI/AAAAAAAAAG0/oWbjCcJGAic/s1600-h/hogans.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088981541583299602" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-xv96XpBI/AAAAAAAAAG0/oWbjCcJGAic/s200/hogans.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Now I am not saying that <em>Bewitched </em>or <em>Hogan’s Heroes</em> constituted the second coming of Shakespeare, or that <em>Family Affair</em> broke new ground in cutting edge entertainment.<br /><br />But bad as the jokes were, at least there was somebody writing them! Even those awful jokes they give to the hosts of <em>America’s Funniest Videos</em> were written (most likely minutes before airing).</span><br /><br /><span style="color:#000000;">Who remembers the TV writers’ strike oh 1988?</span><br /></span><a href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_PVd6XpQI/AAAAAAAAAIs/xrVv_bW-_1o/s1600-h/Strike.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089014071665599746" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_PVd6XpQI/AAAAAAAAAIs/xrVv_bW-_1o/s200/Strike.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></span><a href="http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/jan01/jan15/3_wed/news3wednesday.html"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#3333ff;">http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/jan01/jan15/3_wed/news3wednesday.html</span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">I dare say coincidentally, television has not been the same since. Hollywood in a panic began to stockpile scripts in anticipation of the walk-out. Scripts? You mean TV shows are actually written? By human beings?<br /><br />To paraphrase a famous quote …<br /><br />If you give an infinite amount of monkeys an infinite amount of typewriters, they will eventually write an episode of <em>Desperate Housewives</em>.</span> </span><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088981996849832994" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-yKd6XpCI/AAAAAAAAAG8/0eXmkVSulAE/s200/TypingMonkeyLarge.jpg" border="0" /> <span style="color:#000000;">The plague of “reality” television can be partially blamed on the British who ‘developed’ <em>Big Brother, Celebrity Big Brother, Survivor, Wife Swap</em> and <em>American Idol</em> (called <em>Pop Idol</em> in Britain) amongst others.</span><br /><br /></span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:British_reality_television_series"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#3333ff;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:British_reality_television_series</span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /></span><a href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-0iN6XpDI/AAAAAAAAAHE/kZqr8pA2ScQ/s1600-h/tvchains.gif"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088984603894981682" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px" alt="" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-0iN6XpDI/AAAAAAAAAHE/kZqr8pA2ScQ/s200/tvchains.gif" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Can’t you people see you are being hoodwinked? Are you THAT gullible that you</span> </span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">can’t see that the TV people just don’t want to pay writers so they hook you with this crap? TV was long ago referred to as “the opiate of the people” but today it’s more like crack cocaine.<br /><br />Are people THAT ignorant and apathetic that they don’t realize that the people with REAL power want you hooked on ‘reality’ TV, <em>Inside Edition</em> and <em>Entertainment Tonight</em> so you won’t occupy yourself thinking about (and perhaps doing something about) how they – the people with money and power – are screwing you and keeping you in your place?</span><br /><br /><em><span style="color:#3333ff;">“Well hell Bubba, so longs as I gots my 72” plasma HDTV, I is happy to go on living like a moron with a dead end job and no prospects for the future!”</span></em><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088984831528248386" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-0vd6XpEI/AAAAAAAAAHM/PtP0rRc6L7o/s200/big+screen.jpg" border="0" /> </span><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;">The irony is of course that there is nothing ‘real’ about reality TV. And whilst some people say, “yeah I know that but it is still entertaining,’ the fact is that most people do think it is “real”. You put a camera on someone and I am sorry but they do NOT behave the way they would without one. And the producers deliberately goad and coerce outlandish behavior out of their hand-picked talking props.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_Rpt6XpTI/AAAAAAAAAJE/msBCqqb-n60/s1600-h/realitytv.gif"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089016618581206322" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_Rpt6XpTI/AAAAAAAAAJE/msBCqqb-n60/s200/realitytv.gif" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Virtual reality? What the hell is wrong with virtuous reality?<br /><br />The latest wave of reality shows are the so-called “America’s Next …. (Fill in the blank).<br /><br />Next top model, pussycat doll, Donald Trump flunkey, designer, top chef blah blah blah. The surest way to disappear into obscurity is to ‘WIN’ one of these “contests.” When is the last time you ran out to Kmart to by the latest CD by Reuben from <em>American Idol</em>?</span><span style="color:#000000;"> </span><br /><br /><span style="color:#000000;">Wouldn’t it be nice if by the time we got around to picking this year’s <em>American Idol</em>, last </span></span><a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_B5t6XpJI/AAAAAAAAAH0/rt-HQUIwl6k/s1600-h/jiffylube.gif"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088999301273068690" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_B5t6XpJI/AAAAAAAAAH0/rt-HQUIwl6k/s200/jiffylube.gif" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">year’s winner hadn’t already blown the winnings, become more obscure than Ron Paul and working part time at his or her hometown Jiffy Lube?</span><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">You see the worst part is that for an entire generation, they won’t know anything but this mind-numbing mush. I am not one of those who advocates that TV be filled with nothing but opera and Macbeth. But God knows if that was all that was on, people would watch it.<br /><br />But I do think we owe it to the younger generation … the “y” generation …or as I call them, the “Y Bother?” generation that there is more to life than this mental anesthesia.<br /><br />Even the Gen Xers can recall when the “M” in MTV stood for music. You’ve got about as much a chance of seeing an actual music video on MTV as Britney Spears has of winning the mother-of-the-year award.</span> </span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089000396489729186" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="85" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_C5d6XpKI/AAAAAAAAAH8/g5bLa1E_O20/s200/mtv.jpg" width="105" border="0" /> </span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">One on hand, I never liked music videos. Music should be an aural experience. The pictures should be provided from your own experiences of when you heard the song. Pick any song from the 70’s before music videos and I see an elaborate visual with colors truer than a Bollywood production. But the images are of my youth, the people I knew and the things we did when the song was on the radio.<br /><br />But on the other hand, I’d rather watch an AHA video for 24 straight hours than three minutes of “<em>Pimp My Crib</em>” or whatever the hell it’s called.<br /><br />Video did indeed kill the radio star. Can you imagine Meatloaf trying to make it as a new performer today? He doesn’t have “the look”. Simon Cowell would rip him a new one and then send him over to the folks at <em>America’s Biggest Loser</em>!<br /><br />I’ve begged my wife and pleaded with all sincerity for her not to get hooked on one more “reality” show. A mere nano-second of one of them being heard by me in the next room starts to make me physically ill. But to no avail. Not only does she watch America’s Biggest Loser – which by the way … I think the title reflects any/all of its viewers – but she DVRs all the episodes she might otherwise miss.<br /><br />She says she needs to rest her (Oxford educated) mind. But I fear it may lapse into a coma! </span><br /></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;"></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Has it come to this? Has watching fat people lose weight become mainstream entertainment? These people represent millions of Americans with a serious health problem … a problem that is (pardon the pun) growing at an alarming rate.</span><br /><br /></span><a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_ATt6XpII/AAAAAAAAAHs/1Vvgk2UfKAc/s1600-h/doritos.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088997548926411906" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_ATt6XpII/AAAAAAAAAHs/1Vvgk2UfKAc/s200/doritos.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">But watching them shed the pounds in the guise of a competition is a huge hit with the audience … most of whom (my wife excluded) I ironically imagine to be the very type of couch potato sloths who, when they lose the remote, the first place they look for it, is in the Doritos bag! </span><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;">I can’t watch this. I CAN’T. Quick change the channel! Oh good … that’s better … It’s Takeru Kobayashi winning another hot dog eating contest! Most of the world is starving and we compete to gorge ourselves and then compete again to take off the weight! No wonder the world hates America.<br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;">And just what message are all these “America’s Next” shows sending the “Y Bother” generation?<br /><br />Why bother WORKING … God forbid focusing all your power-drink-enhanced energy … on actually paying your dues and earning success when you can WIN a career, like some sort of church picnic raffle? They’ve turned the American work ethic into a game show.<br /><br />All this insta-celeb culture leads me to rephrase the famous Andy Warhol quote because these people are getting 15 <strong>seconds</strong> of fame. These “stars’ have a shorter shelf life than an open tub of cream cheese on a hot afternoon in the Mojave.<br /><br />I could launch into the whole psychobabble discussion of America’s (and indeed the world’s) addiction to fame, the famous and the paparazzi.<br /><br />But as I see it, The National Enquirer outsells Time Magazine. So the dumbing down of America is inevitable. The powers (dare I say conspiracy) that want it that way are too strong to fight.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_DP96XpLI/AAAAAAAAAIE/n8uBysNZxq4/s1600-h/topmodelgroup.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089000783036785842" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_DP96XpLI/AAAAAAAAAIE/n8uBysNZxq4/s200/topmodelgroup.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;">Wait …what’s that? There was another recent … almost unnoticed TV writers strike and the (12-person) writing staff of <em>America’s Next Top Model </em>became the first reality TV writers to go on strike? </span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;"></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">They have WRITERS? What were they striking for? Etching there ON STRIKE sandwich boards gave them a chance to actually do some writing perhaps? </span><span style="color:#000000;">All of which begs to ask the question ... where are <em>America's Next Top <strong>Writers</strong></em>? </span></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">What’s next? <em>America’s Next Top Plumber</em>? <em>America’s Next Top Janitor</em>? </span><br /><span style="color:#000000;"></span><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">Why not launch <em>America’s Next Top LEADER</em>, in which all the Presidential candidates live together at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and we get to vote them off one at a time? I bet we’d get greater voter participation that we do in the elections!<br /></span><br /><br /></span><p><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089010979289146578" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 213px; HEIGHT: 157px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="183" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_Mhd6XpNI/AAAAAAAAAIU/XiMIC5Yarpo/s200/whitehouse.jpg" width="253" border="0" /></span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;">Of course the top designer, top chef, top model shows all have the obligatory token caricature of the over-the-top overly campy, “I shoulda been on <em>Will and Grace</em>" gay guy. I’m not a homophobe …in fact … IF I were gay; I would be deeply OFFENDED by the clichéd and hackneyed single-minded portrayal that I feel borders on exploitation.<br /><br />To me (and I respect your right to disagree) it would be like if every black man on television was forced to act like Rochester from <em>The Jack Benny Show</em>.<br /></span><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_P796XpRI/AAAAAAAAAI0/nauPpUGKHG8/s1600-h/riptaylor.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089014733090563346" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_P796XpRI/AAAAAAAAAI0/nauPpUGKHG8/s200/riptaylor.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;"><br />I hope I hear a murmur of support amongst the out-of-the-closet-without-being-extremely-effeminate male gay community? Not EVERY gay man prances around and flounces about like it’s some sort of Village People reunion at Rip Taylor’s house.<br /><br />You don’t see Ellen Degeneres lifting weights or spitting tobacco to assert her sexuality now do you? She’s lesbian. We get that. But she is on TV because she is FUNNY and entertains us. If TV execs truly feel that just being gay is entertaining, then shame on them!<br /><br />Not to be assumptive, but maybe the author of the following open letter </span><a href="http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/lax/336540406.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;color:#3333ff;">http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/lax/336540406.html</span></a><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;"> MIGHT agree with me?<br /><br />So what other choices are there?<br /><br />Well let’s start with “<em>The View</em>” … which I often refer to as ‘The Vagina Dialogues.’<br /><br />I think of it as …”PMTV” (In England, PMS is called PMT – substituting the word “tension” for the word “syndrome” – the rest is still pre-menstrual).<br /><br />A bunch of cackling females, whining and moaning is fine if they served the purpose of elevating their predominantly house-wife (sorry … domestic engineer) audience. Instead it’s the coffee klatch from hell, like a beauty parlor on acid. It’s the only place you’ll see more bitches fighting than at Michael Vick’s house!</span></p><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089260568428651938" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/RqCvhd6XpaI/AAAAAAAAAJ8/ToKIZPje34A/s200/MichaelVick.jpg" border="0" /><br /></span><p align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;">Though I personally reject the notion of being a “post modernist” and its smugly arrogant notions like, “we are at the end of history.” (Of course we are dipsh*t … everything else is the future) … I do prescribe to the theory that there is no originality left … or maybe it's just more cost efficient not to pursue it.<br /><br />TV is not the only medium afflicted with this plague of spin-offs (of other spin-offs) franchising (see <em>CSI, CSI Miami, CSI New York, CSI Hoboken</em> etc.), blatantly copying successful shows from other networks etc.<br /><br />Those attached to the more prestigious ‘big screen’ are just as bad. And by big screen I mean movies (not your 400-inch, rear projection, plasma, digital, HDTV, wall hugging ostentatious monstrosity that dominates your living room)<br /><br />We are at a time when cinematic Hollywood is completely starved for a single original thought as well… leading to the regurgitation of every bad 60’s 70’s and 80’s sitcom and police drama as a ‘full length feature without the original cast of course … who are either too busy working as guest judges on “America’s Next …” shows, or perhaps are also working at Jiffy Lube.<br /></span><a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-9Wt6XpHI/AAAAAAAAAHk/JD_PwW3X844/s1600-h/cuckooman.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088994301931136114" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-9Wt6XpHI/AAAAAAAAAHk/JD_PwW3X844/s200/cuckooman.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;"><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="color:#000000;">We live in a time where Hollywood is making a movie about every comic book ‘superhero’ this side of Cuckoo Man … and spewing trilogies and sequels and prequels rather than (God-forbid) come up with something new.<br /><br />My personal [least] favorite is the <em>Ocean’s 11, 12 and 13</em> trilogy which not only is jumping the shark in every sequel but you must remember (and of course Hollywood is banking on the fact that most of the audience will be too young to remember) that <em>Ocean’s 11</em> was actually a REMAKE of a classic Rat Pack film.</span><br /><br /></span></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="color:#000000;">Did I just have an LSD relapse or did Sylvester Stallone REALLY release another <em>Rocky</em> movie last year? I mean come on. I guess we are about due for <em>Police Academy 25</em> by now?<br /><br />I read the jump-the-shark website</span> (</span></span><a href="http://www.jumptheshark.com/"><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;">http://www.jumptheshark.com/</span></a><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;">) </span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="color:#000000;">which goes through a litany of TV shows and when exactly they “jumped the shark”<br /><br />The phrase “jump the shark” is derived specifically from an episode of <em>Happy Days</em> when Fonzie jumped over a shark on water skis (Fonzie wearing them, not the shark) and has come to mean the obvious point, in which a television show has outlived its purpose … when, after hitting its peak, has begun a downward slide.</span> </span></span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088992931836568674" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-8G96XpGI/AAAAAAAAAHc/xbTsH-rXIaQ/s200/fonze.jpg" border="0" /><br /></span></p><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color:#000000;">And I put it to you …that TV itself … has jumped the shark.<br /><br />I used to enjoy the History Channel except that it is besieged by a program called <em>'Modern' Marvels</em>. To me the words ‘history’ and ‘modern’ are mutually exclusive.</span> </span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5088986313291965522" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp-2Ft6XpFI/AAAAAAAAAHU/wJ9QyvxbKeU/s200/HistoryChannelLogo.gif" border="0" /></span><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;">I watched the English version of The History Channel whilst we lived there and they seem to omit nearly all of the over 1,000 years of post Normanic Conquest, in favor of the six-year period of 1939-1945.<br /><br />It’s essentially “Hitlervision” - All Hitler … All the time.<br /><br />The obsessive Nazification of British franchise of the History Channel is the only place you’ll see more swastikas than at Marge Schott’s house. </span><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_Sx96XpUI/AAAAAAAAAJM/EswEUEUzWxw/s1600-h/trappedtv.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5089017859826754882" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_lMeTGImhblQ/Rp_Sx96XpUI/AAAAAAAAAJM/EswEUEUzWxw/s200/trappedtv.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;color:#000000;"><br /><br />Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go read a book.</span></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">Don't Agree? Get your own blog!</div>NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16568632.post-1164052864890330612006-11-20T14:53:00.000-05:002006-11-22T17:54:18.690-05:00KIDS TV<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/kidwatchestv.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="158" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/kidwatchestv.jpg" width="132" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;"> </span><p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/kidwatchtv.gif"><span style="font-family:georgia;"></span></a><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">Before I tackle the more general topic of the decline of television … I shall rant firstly about children’s television. As the father of a 4-year-old, I only get a few moments per week of control of the remote and I try to reserve them for an occasional sports event.<br /><br />When I was a kid, if you missed your favorite kids show, you missed it – plain and simple. Now in the age of VCRs, DVRs, Recordable DVDs, and “On-Demand” cable … the kids can watch their favorite shows whenever they want. And in theory this is good. When I was young, I remember the hell we put our parents through trying to rush them through the Friday night supermarket trip to get home in time for <em>The Brady Bunch</em>.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/bradybunch.jpg"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 271px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 200px" height="140" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/bradybunch.jpg" width="202" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">What an innocent time, when kids’ prime time TV favorite was the story of a semi-functional step family … headed by the only architect in the world who would choose to raise six kids in a three-bedroom house.<br /><br />I learned two great life lessons watching this show …<br /><br />First … <em>thanks to Greg</em> …<br /><br />When mom finds cigarettes in your jacket pocket, be thankful she didn’t dig further and unearth the condoms.<br /><br />And second … <em>thanks to Marcia</em> …<br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/marcianose.gif"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/marcianose.gif" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;"><br />When catching a football pass above the shoulders, one must place his/her thumbs together, and watch the ball into your hands ... otherwise one’s nose might be fractured.<br /><br /><br />But even with all the recordable options today, the kids still want the DVDs of the shows … episodes they have seen hundreds of times mind you, or could access through ‘On-Demand’ … but at $14-$20 a pop, the kids want what the kids want!<br /><br />Like grown-up TV, kids TV has suffered from the expansion of available television channels. The vast quantity of stations has spawned a quality vacuum as the air time must be filled with something … anything … to get those little buggers to watch … preferably something that one can use to market teeth-rottening sweetened cereals … or better yet … the merchandising of the show itself.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/dora.0.gif"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/dora.png" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">Queen of the 30-minute commercial / kid’s shows is “<em>Dora the Marketing Opportunity Explorer</em>.”<br /><br />From blankets to books to crayons to clothes … Dora is the Martha Stewart of Kids World. My child has Dora toys, cups, shirts, pajamas and of course … a backpack.<br /><br />But let’s examine this show a little.<br /><br /><em>Dora</em> is praised by children's tv critics and by educators, for teaching kids Spanish. She is clearly Mexican, much to the slight of our Cuban and Puerto Rican Spanish-speaking Americans. One of her gang is always “swiping” things. How does that go down as a stereotypical portrail of the Spanish-speaking community in this, our supposedly enlightened age of political correctness?<br /><br />Dora engages in adventures that always require her to traverse three obstacles (with the aid of a talking map – I see an opening for some cross marketing with Garmin GPS inc.) She makes her audience repeat those three obstacles with her … For example ..<br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/borderpatrolagent.jpg"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/borderpatrolagent.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:georgia;"><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /><em>“To get to the prize</em> (maybe a job as a migrant fruit picker) <em>we have to get past the Rio Grande River …. The border patrol … and Fear-mongering Republicans … Say it with me … Rio Grande River … border patrol … fear-mongering republicans!” </em></span></span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">Dora was so popular that she launched a spin-off of more adventures with her male cousin <em>Diego</em> ... thus furthering the angst of people like Pat Buchanan ... promoting xenophobia ... that once one gets in, they'll bring in their relatives!</span></p><p align="justify"><br /><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">Another extrememly popular kids’ show is “The Wiggles” … An Aussie quartet of cheesy musicians who sing kids songs about fruit salad. These four 30-40-something single males like kids a lot and I know I am not supposed to, but I find that a little frightening. They hang around with a pirate and a dinosaur (who doesn’t?) and dress in their own solid color, looking a bit like outback Starfleet Academy rejects. </span></p><p><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/wigglesabo.jpg" border="0" /></span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">Musically simple and kid friendly, the Wiggles are a sort of preschool Beatles (the nice ones - before they grew their hair long). I suppose that leaves ... in the Rolling Stones (bad boy) role ... the <em>Doodlebops</em> ... who are musically more original and even let their bus driver do the rap parts. I know I am looking at a lifetime of therapy for admitting this, but I can't help nut find DeeDee Doodle a little attractive in a "I wonder what she looks like under the face paint and chalky foam skin?" kind of way.<img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/doodlebops.1.jpg" border="0" /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;"></span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">Then, there's "The Little Einsteins" This Disney channel favorite, features four kids who fly all over in a rocket ship. There are two females and two males (one of whom is black - thus meeting the P.C. requirement - although only the white male gets to drive the rocket).<img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/littleeinsteins01.0.jpg" border="0" /></span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">These four imps set off on fantastic adventures where each episode has a featured classical composer and an artist. What that has to do with Einstein is beyond me. I never heard Einstein's "<em>Quantum Concerto in MC squared minor</em>" for example. I suppose they'll come up with a kid's show about science and call it "Little Mozarts"?</span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;">Perhaps even more disturbing to me is the friekish familiarity that the Leo character invokes ... as if he is someone else from another time ... someone I knew and trusted as a youth. Could it be? I'm not sure but ... perhaps if I jumped into my 'way-back' machine, I could go back to the children's TV of <em>my</em> youth and see that Leo is infact, the 3rd millenium incarnation of <em>Sherman</em>!</span></p><p><span style="font-family:georgia;font-size:130%;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/400/sherman.jpg" border="0" /></span></p><p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/PlayhouseDisney.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/PlayhouseDisney.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Another favorite program of my 4-year-old is "<em>Bear in the Big Blue House</em>" ... although you have</span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/bearbigblue.jpg"></a><span style="font-size:130%;"> to get up with the farmers these days for its (6 AM) airing on <em>Playhouse Disney</em>. Bear is a likeable fellow. I am always slightly squirmish when TV teaches pre-schoolers that bears and other ferocious animals are really just big friendly teacher types. </span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">"Bear" did release a very popular and effective home video aid for toilet/potty training ... where the characters all sing that they are "<em>toiletteers</em>"! ... thus eternally confusing our youngsters to the question ... "does a bear shit in the woods?" - <em>Not unless he has a potty out there.</em></span></p><p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/flintstones.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 126px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 107px" height="44" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/flintstones.jpg" width="43" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">It's amazing how the innocently delivered sub-messages of kids' shows can serve to confuse us well into our school years. I remember when I was in first grade, thinking that ... in terms of chronological history ... the caveman days must have come after colonial times ... because the <em>Flintstones</em> were cavemen, yet they had cars, record players, bowling alleys etc. whilst the colonials wrote with feathers by candlelight.</span></p><p align="justify"><em><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></em></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">Another program that baffles me is "<em>Caillou</em>" ... the inquistively whining milquetoast</span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/caillou.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 172px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 99px" height="167" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/caillou.jpg" width="224" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;"> chemotherapy-looking, bald kid, with the wimpy enabler parents. They give this kid a first name (pronounced "<em>Kie-you</em>") that sounds like a cajun word for "let the playground beatings begin" and if that's not enough to ensure misfit status, they give him less hair than Charlie Brown.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;">Although Americans must take the blame for the origins of the most irritating tv character (no, not Bill O'Reilly) ... I talk of course of <em>Barney</em> ... the mainstays of irritating kids characters comes from England. They of course gave us <em>The Teletubbies, Bob the Builder</em> and <em>Thomas the Tank Engine</em>.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">However, the Brits also gave us one of the most enduring classics in Winnie the Pooh. Brits were rightfully beside themselves when Disney purchased the rights to Pooh from the family of A.A. Milne. <img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/PoohPigletTigger.jpg" border="0" /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/spongebob.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 151px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 103px" height="142" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/spongebob.jpg" width="206" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Though waning in popularity ... "so last year" according to most preschoolers ... "<em>Sponge Bob</em>" continues to irk parents on a daily basis. The so-called multi-level humor - ie, a portion of the humor that will go over the heads of the kids, but can be appreciated by the parents - is in the mold of "<em>Ren & Stimpy</em>" ... but at least "<em>Ren & Stimpy</em>" were targeted to adults first and kids second, unlike our porous, sea-faring, absorbant, bottom-feeding friend.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;">And inevitably of course, there's "<em>Boo Bah</em>"</span></p><p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/Boohbah.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" height="135" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/Boohbah.jpg" width="137" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Teaching our children, the ins and outs ... of what is essentially a boob box acid trip ... these rotund furry carbon-based globules of existence, streak across the sky, leaving colorful trails and communicating in some sort of squeek language under the guise of children's educational television. Somewhere in the dark recesses of the creator's mind, lies a freudian nightmare laced with laudnum induced apocalyptic visions ... sort of Jim Henson meets Colonel Walter E. Kurtz.</span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>Sesame Street</em> continues on. Though I was just a tad too old to be into the '<em>Street</em>' when it</span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/rogers.jpg"></a><span style="font-size:130%;"> premiered, it is still recognized as the leader in preschool educational TV. <em>Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood</em> is still being aired though I am pretty sure Fred Rogers has gone to that big cardigan-wearing magic kingdom in the sky, which is a little difficult to explain to a 4-year-old.</span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/rogers.0.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 228px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 196px" height="196" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/rogers.0.jpg" width="212" border="0" /></span></a></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">By the way, here is a little trivia you can use at your next cocktail soiree ... Fred Rogers was born in Latrobe, PA. ... the same town that gave us Rolling Rock beer ... which is kind of 'sneakers and old sweater' brew ... watered-down and harmless ... but still ... in a weird and twisted kind of way .. it's kind of a strange coincidence ...max respect Mr. R.! </span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">While I doubt Fred actually ever downed a six of 'ponies' ... at least he didn't hail from Intercourse, PA.</span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">But of the children's TV of my (late baby boomer) generation, what's wrong with showing the kids the classics ... the gratuitously violent, non-educational, mind-numbingly simple, child-occupying drivel that I loved so much? I speak of Top Cat, Sylvestor the Cat, Tom & Jerry, Felix the Cat, Josie and the Pussycats (I had an early feline fixation) ... not to mention Bugs Bunny, Road Runner, The Wacky Racers, Prince Planet, Speed Racer, Astroboy, Aquaman et al.</span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">For non-animated classics, we had <em>'Juvenile Jury'</em> (Insert your own OJ joke here).</span></p><p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/Romper.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/Romper.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">There was also Captai<em>n Kangaroo</em>, though I personally didn't dig the Captain. As a child of the late 60's I was far more into the groovy "<em>Romper Room</em>" where (belive it or not) an oversized bumble bee (waiting for a break in Mexican TV no doubt) called "Mr. Doobie" ... aided the scary Orwellian hostess (Miss Sally) to look through a glassless mirror to (as she claimed) SEE through the TV and see who was watching her! Oh FREAK me out and instill a lifetime of issues on me why don't ya!</span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">Kids' TV today is too commercial-driven to be creative but the multimedia availability is something I would have loved to have had as a kid. Now as a parent I can only long for the day when my child outgrows this tripe and uses the TV what it's meant for ... the XBox!</span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">Can it be long before Kids 'reality' TV comes along? Rumer has it that PBS is developing a potty training reality show called "Poop Idol".</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">Don't Agree? Get your own blog!</div>NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16568632.post-1154579666648857282006-08-03T00:32:00.000-04:002006-11-22T18:06:07.843-05:00WE HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR BUT PHARMAS THEMSELVES<div align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/restlesslegs.jpg"><span style="color:#000000;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 180px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 169px" height="236" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/restlesslegs.jpg" width="197" border="0" /></span></a><span style="color:#000000;">I was watching TV the other night and saw a commercial for some new medication for something that sounded serious … “RLS”!<br /><br />They went on to explain that RLS was “restless leg syndrome.”<br /><br />WHAT?<br /><br />Oh come on now! The pharmaceutical companies are just flat out making shit up now to sell more drugs to more people who are too stupid for their own good. The makers (GlaxoSmithKline) of this new wonder drug (“Requip”) are an otherwise reputable pharmaceutical giant. (Although that is a bit like saying someone is an honest lawyer or a trustworthy politician).<br /><br />Unfortunately these corporate pharma behemoths are so over-invested in so many drugs that will never get FDA approval, much less show any signs of effectiveness, that now they have taken to flat out making shit up just to get a drug on the market… just to pay for the research of the 99% of the drugs that … in the words of the Verve … “don’t work.”<br /><br />These multinational drug companies KNOW that America is the place to sell this crap because face it … Americans will buy anything that sounds like an easy solution.<br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/restlesslegs02.0.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" height="167" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/restlesslegs02.jpg" width="141" border="0" /></a><br />Restless legs? Try some exercise. You drive your car to the end of the driveway just to get your mail and maybe pop out for some drive through at the local Krispy Kreme. Your legs are restless because you only use them to form a lap for holding your array of salted fatty couch potato snacks.<br /><br />OK … So MAYBE … there are people who have just a slight tingling in their legs and it’s a TAD annoying at times. This drug is not just recommended (by GlaxoSmithKline) for severe sufferers … nooooooo …. Where’s the money in that? It’s also available for moderate sufferers of tingly legs.<br /><br />The ‘condition’ is described as “chronic” – the favorite word of pharmas and hypochondriacs alike. Chronic means basically, that the ‘condition’ just won’t go away – without (expensive) medication – or exercise of course, but pharmas don’t own a share of Bally’s … so that’s out.<br /><br />Now before you go commenting about your Auntie or neighbor who ‘suffers’ from this malady … stop and consider this …<br /><br />And this is a direct quote from the </span><a href="http://www.requip.com/?banner_s=33642256&rotation_s=13278497"><span style="color:#000000;">Requip official website</span></a><span style="color:#000000;">: </span></div><span style="color:#000000;"><div align="justify"><br /></div></span><span style="color:#000000;"><p align="justify"></span></p><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/rlsdrug.png" border="0" /> <p align="justify"><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>“Requip may cause you to fall asleep or feel sleepy while doing normal activities such as driving; or to faint or feel dizzy, nauseated or sweaty when you stand up from sitting or lying down. If you experience these problems, talk to your doctor. Tell your doctor if you drink alcohol or are taking other medicines that make you drowsy. Side effects include nausea, drowsiness, vomiting and dizziness. Most patients were not bothered enough to stop taking Requip.”</em><br /><br />Where do I start?<br /><br />Well first this sounds like nothing but a sleeping tablet. Of course your legs don’t bother you when you’re in a deep drug-induced sleep. You’re so drowsy you can’t be bothered to stop taking it? Not lucid enough to make intelligent decisions it sounds like me!<br /><br />And even if you do ‘suffer’ from restless legs, I can only speak for intelligent people when I say … weighing restless legs against nausea, vomiting drowsiness and dizziness, I’ll live with the leg tingles thank you very much.<br /><br />By the way … “RLS” should not be confused with the fatal disease known as</span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/lougehrig.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/lougehrig.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;"> “ALS” (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). This disease is also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease. Lou Gehrig was a famous baseball player. Did you know that he actually caught AND died from Lou Gehrig’s disease? WHAT are the odds of THAT happening? They must be astronomical!<br /><br />Getting back to RLS … It is just one of countless ‘syndromes’ that ‘doctors’ have ‘discovered’ in recent years. These so-called syndromes are not new… just giving them a name is new. You see if you give something a name, then it can be blamed. And our society has made it its raison d’etre to be personally blameless and eternal victims. This is the easier road to travel than actually taking responsibility for our own actions and well-being.<br /><br />There are lots of new ‘syndromes’ now being marketed, and almost downright trendy to have. Not surprisingly, these new names are generally introduced along with another new name …the name of the wonder-drug invented and designed to fight off the evil … and perform a money-ectomy from the invalids who until recently, did not know they were sufferers!<br /><br />Maybe you’re a martyr who carries the cross of ‘male pattern hair-loss’? When I was a kid we called this going bald.<br /><br />Having bad breath doesn’t sound sympathetic. So we are inflicted with halitosis!<br /><br />Your colon is not inflamed! NO. That could sound like your fault. You are burdened with diverticulitis!<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/chronicfatigue.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/chronicfatigue.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">How about the millions of yuppies being tortured with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome? These people can also say they are victims of narcolepsy. Oh please … just once … let someone who works for me call in sick with this one!<br /><br />What was that trendy malady about a decade ago called? Juan Epstein or Roseanne Barr virus or some such? OK, I know Epstein Barr virus is actually a herpesvirus that is the causative agent of infectious mononucleosis. It is also associated with various types of human cancers.<br /><br />But none-the-less, it became the must-have trendy illness of the”I’ve-spent-all-my-money-on-plastic-surgery-and-now-need-a-real-doctor” upper class snots. Personally I’d have liked to vaccinate them all with a nice shot of bubonic plague.<br /><br />By the way, did you know the symptoms of bubonic plague (aka Yersinia pestis) include: nausea, drowsiness, vomiting and dizziness? – The same as the list of side effects for that restless leg syndrome medicine?<br /><br />Boxers used to be called ‘punchy’ or ‘punch drunk’. Now they all suffer from post-concussion syndrome.<br /><br />Enough is enough. The use of euphemisms … spurred by the imposed political correctness of those who fear their very existence offends somebody … has created such a surreal madness that we’ve lost touch with what real illness is. Some might say this blog is belittling the needs and pains of real sufferers. I say it’s quite the opposite. It is lumping the every day whimperings of feigned illness in with real suffering, that belittles the real suffering.<br /><br />I mean it’s bad enough that medical science chooses such bizarre unsympathetic names for legitimate ailments. I can’t imagine I’d be thrilled if I had the shakes and the doctor diagnosed me with ‘St. Vitus Dance’. That sounds like a Friday night event when I was in high school – Who am I going to take to the St Vitus Dance? </span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/jitterbug.jpg" border="0" /><br />I do not lack sympathy for people with real medical conditions. And there have been recently discovered NEW ones …. AIDS, Sars, Ebola Virus, Mad-Asian-Cow-Bird-Flu etc.<br /><br />But that’s just my point. By speaking of these real (often fatal) diseases in the same breath as </span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/rx.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/rx.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">these made-up chronic conditions, just serves to legitimize those daily bellyaches as ‘real’ medical problems. This is being done as one of the largest unspoken, unchallenged conspiracies among the pharma companies of the world.<br /><br />Their marketing strategy – though you won’t find this in any of their ‘mission statements’ is apparently based on this one thought.<br /><br />If we can’t find cures for real and fatal, or life-altering afflictions, then we will find (and market) cures for things we can find cures for, no matter how irrelevant or real these ‘infirmities’ may be.<br /><br />Can’t afford a syndrome? That’s ok … we have plenty of ‘disorders’ you can suffer from.<br /><br />There are learning disorders, personality disorders, sleeping disorders, anxiety disorders. Take your pick. You can have an attention disorder, repetitive motion disorder, repetitive strain disorder, an oppositional defiant disorder or a disassociative disorder (used to be known as having multiple personalities).<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/obese.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/obese.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">There are all sorts of eating disorders out there to choose from too. But they are only for people who don’t eat enough. Our morbidly obese nation wouldn’t stand for it if we considered it to be a disorder to stuff our big (halitosis yielding) slobbering mouths with salty deep-fried, artery choking, nutritionally-challenged meals from out fast food institutions!<br /><br />Maybe our bad backs and stem from the fact that as a nation we are grossly overweight? – <em>Just a thought</em>.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/carpal.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/carpal.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Oh the pain suffered by those with carpal tunnel syndrome! (sore wrists essentially). Those damned computers! They cause my migraines from staring at the screen, they cause me to go cross-eyed (aka Strabismus – give that a name so you can offer a marketable cure) … and now they make my wrist hurt. I quite literally believe these sore wrist sufferers might be suffering from “I wank too much disorder” Or “I just want to call in sick today syndrome.”<br /><br />You can’t honestly tell me, that tip tapping away at today’s ‘ergonomic’ computer keyboards does more harm than was caused back in the day when a secretary’s desk had no computer, but rather a large, hard and stiff manual type writer.<br /><br />We’ve become a nation of out-of-shape, whining hypochondriac wimps! America was founded on the (sore) backs of real laborers who proudly displayed a real work ethic. It’s only once the snake oil salesmen of the Wild West organized themselves (into what we call in the modern day –“pharmaceutical companies’) that our mal du jour society emerged as a nation of namby pamby milquetoast mama’s boys with a demand for softer facial tissues.<br /><br />Our country has become home to a bunch of sniveling, sniffling office toady, service-industry desk-ridden computer jockeys who can’t so much sneeze without running to the pharmacy … the one in the supermarket so we can get more snacks … for the latest OTC (over-the-counter) remedy that merely attacks symptoms not causes.<br /><br />Hey that sounds familiar! Attack the symptoms and not the causes. Why that’s been the platform of every administration since Taft hasn’t it? I mean why address why terrorists hate us (or why everyone hates us for that matter) based on our self-indulgent policies when we can declare a war on something? (War on terrorism, war on drugs, war on poverty).<br /><br />Wars make us feel good. While our blubbery teletubby bodies are pampered with fast food and fast relief medicines … we can feel good about our weak conditions by collectively flexing the one muscle we have left … our gadget driven military machine. We can watch on the All-War channel (CNN) as America wins wars (though suffering 1,000 times the casualties after the ‘victory’, than during the actual conflict).<br /><br />If we spent a tenth of what we are spending in Iraq and Afghanistan on research into (REAL) medical problems, we could solve many of them and still have money left over to fund a workable health care system and provide health insurance for all.<br /><br />But no. The political powers that be would have to tackle some of their tough/staunch (right wing) stances … on stem cell research for example.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/USFLAG2BIG.png"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/USFLAG2BIG.png" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Our brave lads (and I DO support our troops whether I agree with why they’ve been deployed) can look forward to surviving the conflict so later in life they can join the American Legion. (And get legionnaires disease no doubt).<br /><br />War on drugs? Hey let’s face it. The ‘war’ on drugs has been a farcical exercise is wasting money and filling prisons … with no chance for ‘victory’. If you want to rage a real war on drugs, I feel it is not the street/black-market/illegal drug market we should examine. It is the so-called legitimate (prescription) drug market that is far more a threat. Their drugs are just as addictive (if not more so) and their associated dependence is not only supported by the government but they count on it to feed to ever-growing medical-legal-pharmaceutical triangular trade and also of course … we have to please the share holders.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/technician.gif"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/technician.png" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">We block the importation of cheaper drugs (from Canada for example) and prolong the wait for generics while our older citizens, who need some (but probably not all) of the drugs they have been prescribed are being bankrupted by the failures of Medicare Medicaid.<br /><br />The answer is simple enough. Drug companies should not be permitted to pass on ALL their research costs collectively into the pricing of the drugs they manage to get approved. Their research should be classified into two categories … 1) REAL life threatening or suffering conditions and 2) Cosmetic or superficial drugs (IE Rogaine, Propecia etc.)<br /><br />The costs of researching drugs designed to ‘cure’ life’s little nuisances should be spent at the Pharmaceuticals’ expense and risk.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/ClothesHangar.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 99px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 163px" height="203" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/ClothesHangar.jpg" width="117" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">You may be inclined to counter with the argument that you are not overweight … and actually have a gym membership. Would that be the lifetime gym membership you shelled out a gazillion dollars for and went to the gym as many times in the first month as you have in the three years that followed? Or maybe you bought some home gym equipment? You know that over-sized bench with lots of chrome and rubbery things that takes up a whole room and is essentially being used as a $1500 clothes hanger.<br /><br />Even those who DO exercise are doing so to see and be seen as to actually following a sensible cardiac routine.<br /><br /></span><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>“Gotta look good dude … work the abs!”<br /></em><br />We are also a nation of fad dieters. To name but a FEW … there are: </span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;">Dr. Dean Ornish: Eat More, Weigh Less, The Good Carbohydrate Revolution, The Pritikin Principle, Dr. Shapiro's Picture Perfect Weight Loss, Volumetrics Weight-Control Plan, Fit for Life, The South Beach Diet, Cambridge Diet, Slim-Fast Diet, Neutrisystems, Dexatrim Natural, Hydroxycut, Metabolife 356, Eat Right For Your Type: The Blood Type Diet, Macrobiotics, Mayo Clinic Diet, and of course … Suzanne Somers' Somersizing. </span></p><p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/3company.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/3company.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Yes I want to gamble my future health on the wisdom of Chrissy Snow’s nutritional expertise. I’d be better off letting Jack Tripper cook for me while Mr. Roper slips me a mickey down at the Regal Beagle. </span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;">I remember a few years ago, it was trendy to watch the (saturated and non-saturated) fats. It was all about the fats. Now it’s carbs man. <em>“Gotta watch the carbs.”</em> </span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;">Why? </span></p><p><em><span style="font-size:130%;">“Cause it’s trendy dude – don’t you read People Magazine?” </span></em></p><p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/fernando.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/fernando.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">In the immortal words of Fernando (aka Billy Crystal) … </span><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>“It’s better to look good than to feel good.”<br /></em><br />We’ve coddled our children. We can’t let them outside. God forbid we let them walk outside (and get some exercise) anywhere – that’s what the gas-guzzling minivan is for. Anything outside of sleeping, we require them to wear a helmet and knee pads. We’re WIMPS!<br /><br />Our kids are seeing an alarming increase in rates of allergies and asthma. Could this have something to do with the fact that we never let them outside to get anywhere near a ragweed until they’re in their pre-teens (and then, only whilst wearing an approved helmet of course). Instead we keep them inside, in the hopes that all their X-Box playing will strengthen their carpal tunnels, before they have to grow up and do office work.<br /><br />The world of physical illnesses seems to have taken a page from the realm of mental illness. </span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/freud.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/freud.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">Again, I am not denying the existence of real mental illness, but it has been the practice of psychiatry (since the times of Sigmund Fraud) to label all mental conditions.<br /><br />By giving every mental condition a name, there is something to blame. Therefore we are “not guilty by reason of __________ [fill in your preferred mental illness here].”<br /><br />By defining ‘clinical depression’ for example, we can leave open the door of vagueness that separates this from just “having the blues.” And ($$ - ‘<strong><em>Ca-CHING’</em></strong> - $$ !) we can therefore market a whole array of ‘pick-me-ups’ from mothers’ little helpers to ginseng green tea.<br /><br />Let’s consider bipolar disorder for one. It used to be known as manic depression. But depression can sound self-induced and we don’t want you to blame yourself. Try this new drug instead!<br /><br />Manic depression IS serious. But it’s sooo yesterday. Let’s get the boys in ‘creative’ to come up with something … a syndrome of some sort …otherwise, how can we sell a new drug. Maybe the lads can come up with something ‘sexy’ … something like … “Bi-Polar Disease … THIS is not your FATHER’s manic depression!”<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/logoblackbackground.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/logoblackbackground.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">The mental health industry – and that’s just what it is – an industry … does help many people (stay out of jail). But though there are no known statistics for this, I would estimate that at least one out of every two people, currently in some form on psychological therapy would be an otherwise normal and functioning member of society were it not for the ‘cool’ aspect of being IN therapy amongst LA and New York socialites and also the acceptance that we as a society have allowed for ourselves not to take responsibility for our own happiness. We dish out blame like pork chops at a Baptist picnic.<br /><br />I don’t want to even address tourette’s syndrome. All the good jokes on the topic have already been done. I do have one question though. Is ‘TS’ only suffered in the English speaking world? Or are there victims also shouting curses uncontrollably in Swahili? What about in Cherokee or Faroese? – <em>Just a thought.</em><br /><br />Still don’t think the pharmas are just trying to sell you anything for the sake of making a few bucks? </span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;">Maybe you’ve called the operator (who was ‘<em>standing by’</em>) to order some Garlique! Let’s see … garlic is good for you …there isn’t any in a big mac though …so let’s grind it up into tablet form! We can call it ‘Garlique’ (c’est chic).<br /><br />Americans love tablets more than Moses did. </span></p><p align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/moses.gif"><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></a></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/moses.0.png" border="0" />So beyond the “consult your physician” meds (you know – the ones you need to [talk your doctor into giving you] a prescription for) … and then beyond the OTC (over-the-counter/non-prescription remedies) there lies a quasi-medicinal world of the “all natural” panaceas.<br /><br />These are generally the ones you hear on sports-talk radio ads, or more prominently receive in your “junk” (spam) folder in your email. These herbal wonders promise me a bigger penis and a smaller wallet. They promise to cure everything from athlete’s foot to nervous ticks.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/selfhelp.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/selfhelp.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">For those who prefer NOT to turn themselves into drug-ingesting slaves to the pharma gods … there are self help books. Of course, unless YOU wrote the book yourself …it is not technically SELF help now is it? We are addicted to these books as a nation, more than to drugs I think. Everything from “Ventriloquism for Dummies” to “I’m OK, You’re a Moron.”<br /><br />I suppose I have to address pre-menstrual syndrome. Ladies, I am NOT denying the existence</span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/pms.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" height="215" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/pms.jpg" width="141" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;"> of cramps, pains and mood swings. I have witnessed them and I am a believer. My point is though, that women have been suffering period pains … well …since Eve I suppose. It’s only in this generation that we gave them a more serious sounding name. I credit our British cousins however, who refer to it as PMT (pre-menstrual tension) since ‘tension’ allows the implication to exist that all in the household (not just the period barer) can suffer from the tension. Calling it a ‘syndrome’ seems to imply it’s not normal, when in fact, it is.<br /><br />Popular usage has actually even turned this ‘syndrome’ into a verb … as in “I’m PMSing.”<br /><br />I’d be remiss (though less long-windedly pedantic) if I didn’t address the latest “discovery” of medical science. How often have you been standing around the water cooler, when some colleague hasn’t said, “They can put a man on the moon. You’d think they could come up with some way to cure my erectile dysfunction!”<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/pelebicycle.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/pelebicycle.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">In one of the most bizarre events I’ve ever witnessed, I was watching the World Cup in 2002 (bizarre in itself that I as an American was watching soccer) and I saw a commercial for an Erectile Dysfunction medicine … and the spokesman in the commercial was none other than Brazilian soccer legend … PELE!<br /><br />How hard have the times been for Pele that he would disregard his god-like status in the macho world of soccer (OK football) to do ads for ‘ED’? How much did they have to pay him? The question that sprang immediately to my mind was … “did all those amazing ‘bicycle’ kicks cause Pele a problem that we weren’t previously aware of?<br /><br />First on the market was of course Viagra (Pfizer). But also a quick riser (pun intended) on the market was Cialis (Eli Lilly).<br /><br />In the </span><a href="http://www.cialis.com/index.jsp"><span style="font-size:130%;">Cialis ad</span></a><span style="font-size:130%;">, </span><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="font-size:130%;">… they actually say:<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/cialis.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/cialis.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;"><em>"The most common side effects with CIALIS were headache and upset stomach. Backache and muscle ache were also reported, sometimes with delayed onset. Most men weren't bothered by the side effects enough to stop taking CIALIS. As with any ED tablet, in the rare event of priapism (an erection lasting more than four hours), seek immediate medical help to avoid long-term injury. In rare instances, men taking prescription ED tablets (including CIALIS) reported a sudden decrease or loss of vision. It's not possible to determine if these events are related directly to the ED tablets or to other factors. If you have a sudden decrease or loss of vision, stop taking any ED tablet and call your doctor right away."</em><br /><br />Headache? Isn’t that usually the number one excuse NOT to have sex? Backache? That’ll come from the too much sex I’d imagine.<br /><br />A FOUR HOUR ERECTION? Believe me; my doctor is NOT going to be the first person I consult. I can barely find 15 extra minutes in my day to read the newspaper. What am I going to do with a four hour erection? Oh … and whose “long term injury” am I trying to avoid? Mine or hers?<br /><br />As for the loss of vision … I highly recommend selecting your sexual partner before the onset of blindness or God knows WHAT you’ll end up in bed with. In fact this kind of sounds like the same side effect as in beer.<br /><br /><strong>Here are my top ten predicted –“Soon To Be Made Up Syndromes” the pharmas will unleash upon us any day now:</strong><br /><br />10) <strong>CDS</strong> (chronic disorder syndrome) – Sufferers of every known ailment on the planet (and a few unknown ones) will be relieved when “fukitol” hits the drug store shelves. </span></span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-size:130%;color:#000000;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/fukitol.jpg" border="0" /><br />9) <strong>CDD</strong> (chronic disorder dysfunction) – Similar to CDS, only called this name by a rival pharmaceutical company, at least until the patent lawsuit is settled.<br /><br />8) <strong>CDDS </strong>(chronic disorder dysfunction syndrome) This is a rare and really SERIOUS case of basically any guy who just can’t – for whatever reason - get his shit together.<br /><br />7) <strong>Gonorrhea Ear</strong> – An inner ear venereal infection brought infection brought on by practicing unsafe phone sex. <img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/mainpic.jpg" border="0" />6) <strong>Vitas Gerulaitis</strong> – A newly discovered form of tennis elbow, acquired only when using one of the ‘70’s tennis rackets. You know, the ones actually smaller than a garbage can lid that players today use.<br /><br />5) <strong>S</strong>taying <strong>H</strong>ome <strong>I</strong>n the <strong>T</strong>oilet <strong>S</strong>yndrome: “Can’t come in to work today boss. I got the S.H.I.T.S.”<br /><br />4) <strong>Carpool Tunnel Syndrome</strong> – Anxiety brought on from a carful of smelly co-workers while stuck in traffic in a claustrophobic traffic tunnel.<br /><br />3) <strong>Soccer Mom Rage Disorder</strong> – Anxiety brought on when all the other kids’ moms are driving a new minivan, and you’re still picking the kids up in the '74 AMC wagon. </span></p><p align="justify"><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/wagon.jpg" border="0" /><br />2) <strong>Wonky Mammillatosis</strong> – The effect, soon to be appearing as young women who had breast augmentation surgeries approach middle age.<br /><br />1) <strong>Irritable Vowel Syndrome</strong> – (AKA Pat Sajak’s Disease). Symptoms include an uncontrollable</span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/pat&vanna.0.jpg"><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/pat%26vanna.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-size:130%;"> desire to insert vowels into Czech and Polish surnames like Czyzchky or Wlykvtlcz. The national spokesperson will be Vanna “buy a vowel” White herself.<br /><br />I am going to lie down now and rest before writing any more gives me carpal tunnel tennis elbow. And I fear I am starting dyslexia a case to develop of. I’ve probably lost you several paragraphs ago due to your attention deficit disorder – Not to be confused with George W. … suffers from ‘paying attention to the deficit disorder’.<br /><br />I’ll probably have that recurring nightmare where I am suffering from The China Syndrome. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;color:#000000;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/chinasyndrome01.png" border="0" /><br />I hope my sleep apnea and deviated septum don’t prevent my wife from getting some rest. It probably won’t since I’m sure she’s ingested something today that ‘may cause drowsiness.’ </span></p><span style="color:#000000;"><p><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /></span></p><span style="font-size:130%;"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/lewishuey.jpg" border="0" /></span></span><span style="font-size:130%;"><br /></span><p align="center"><span style="font-size:130%;color:#000000;">I want a New Drug!</span></p><span style="color:#000000;"><p><span style="font-size:130%;">Fukitol credited to - </span><a href="http://www.davesdaily.com/pictures/302-fukitol.htm"><span style="font-size:130%;">http://www.davesdaily.com/pictures/302-fukitol.htm</span></a><span style="font-size:130%;"> </span></span></p><p></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">Don't Agree? Get your own blog!</div>NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.com19tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16568632.post-1151523044683622322006-06-29T19:00:00.000-04:002006-11-22T18:09:39.020-05:00FINALITY OF FLIGHT<p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/overhead%20compartment.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/overhead%20compartment.jpg" border="0" /></span></a></p><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/Deplaning%20El%20Al.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></a></p><span style="font-family:arial;">The airline industry is quite simply, the most sadistic industry in the world.<br /><br />From the time you pass the last “smoking allowed” zone in the airport, until the time you exit your arrival airport, you are constantly bombarded with “NO SMOKING.”<br /><br />Your pilot or flight attendant will tell you that smoking is a violation of federal laws and that smoking in the toilet is banned and that there is a smoke alarm in there and that if you remove the battery or otherwise disable the smoke detector, you are also a federal criminal.<br /><br />OK … I get it … No Smoking!<br /><br /><br /></span><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/nosmoking1.2.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/nosmoking1.2.jpg" border="0" /></span></a></p><span style="font-family:arial;">But THEN … a quick look around shows you … that rather than pay to remove such items … the airlines have left the ashtrays in all the armrests. The smoking/no smoking light … next to the fasten your seatbelts light … is still in place on the ceiling of each cabin … additionally teasing you and reminding you that you may not smoke now …but had it been years ago – different story.<br /><br /><br /><br /></span><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/nosmoking2.0.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/nosmoking2.jpg" border="0" /></span></a></p><span style="font-family:arial;">But here’s the kicker … so then what do the airlines do? They convert their flight crew into meandering sales people. It’s weird to think this ditzy stew … or effeminate steward …who has been trained to save my life in the (unlikely) event that the plane will land in water …that this person now must meet his/her duty-free sales quota.<br /><br />“CIGARETTES SIR?”<br /><br />So if I can’t smoke …PLEASE don’t come down the aisle with your trolley of over-priced teddy bears, Armani-Gucci-Prada leather-bound personal planners and souvenir model airplanes, and then have the audacity to sell me discounted cartons of cigarettes!<br /><br />Not sadistic enough for you? What other industry would require you to pay attention to their hackneyed safety pantomime … where they point out ALL the exit doors … and then just open ONE door when you land so that it takes 45 minutes to get off the damned thing, while every jag off in front of you de-wedges their tuba case-sized “carry-on” out of the overhead?<br /><br /><br /></span><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/stew%20showing%20exits.1.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/stew%20showing%20exits.0.jpg" border="0" /></span></a></p><span style="font-family:arial;">If you had the window seat, this means anyone over 4 feet tall is standing for 45 minutes with their head at a jaunty angle … giving you a neck cramp guaranteed to last you the first half of your vacation!<br /><br />It all starts with booking your flight. Whether you do so online, through a travel agent or at the airport itself, you pay some arbitrary price, knowing no two passengers have paid the same price for their seats, though all will arrive at the same time (barring any “unlikely” event).<br /><br />And though you have paid in full, this does not guarantee you a window seat, an aisle seat, the bulkhead seat … well for that matter any seat! You can still get bumped, since it is common “accepted” practice in the airline industry to overbook.<br /><br />If the plane holds 200 passengers, there is nothing stopping the airlines from selling 300 tickets. Do the math. Can anyone else get away with this? Could your favorite football team sell 70,000 tickets for a stadium that holds 50,000 people?<br /><br />Once, on a flight from Kansas City to Pittsburgh, rather than be bumped, I agreed to take the jump seat … not knowing what the “jump seat” meant other than being assured it did not involve me having to clip on a rope overhead and then bail out when the green light went on.<br /><br /><br /></span><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/jumpseat.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/jumpseat.jpg" border="0" /></span></a></p><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">The jump seat is essentially a seat at the front of the cabin which folds up to the wall when not in use and faces the rest of the passengers. I asked if this is usually used by the crew and they said yes but that flight attendant would sit elsewhere (the floor?) during landing. I was tempted to offer to allow the flight attendant to sit on my lap during take-off and landing - you know – for her safety but whilst my first imaginations conjured up visions of …<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/sexystew2.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/sexystew2.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /></span>Or …<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/sexystew3.1.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/sexystew3.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br />Or even …<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/sexystew9.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/sexystew9.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br />And I realize I am now just posting gratuitous sexy stewardess photos for no redeeming comedic value, but what the heck – I already downloaded them.<br /><br />Or even …<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/sexystew.0.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/sexystew.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br />I quickly realized that I would most likely get an involuntary turbulence-induced lap dance from the likes of …<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/uglystew.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/uglystew.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br />Or worse yet …<br /><br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/malefa.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/malefa.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br />Speaking of which … whatever happened to the image of the eager-to-please, gorgeous, nympho-ditzy stewardess? Yes Mr. Left-Wing, Bleeding-Heart Politically-Correctoid, I said STEWARDESS – not “flight attendant.” What’s next? Calling strippers “lap attendants?”<br /><br />At one time, STEWARDESSES were required to be of a certain height, weight and attractiveness. Oh, and they were required to be female. I want to have my 2 oz minican of coke brought to me by someone who looks like ...<br /></span><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/sxystew01.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/sxystew01.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /></span>… not like ...<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/reno.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/reno.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /></span></span></span></span><p></p><span style="font-family:arial;">Oh well. Of course, being married now and probably with most of my flying time behind me, it doesn’t matter now anyhow.<br /><br />So from KC to Pittsburgh I flew backwards! I had to hold my meal on my lap, whilst watching all the other passengers chow down, many with their mouths open. I did not get to see the in-flight presentation of “Ishtar” or whatever B-movie they were offering. And just what the heck was MY “crash position” I should assume in the (unlikely) event of a “water landing.”?<br /><br />Alright, so you booked your flight and are not going to be bumped. You still have to show up hours before the flight for the check-in. You get in a <span style="font-family:arial;">massive</span> queue and inch your bags through the cattle maze so that by the time you get to the desk you’re minutes away from boarding with no time for duty-free even though when you joined the queue it was three hours before the scheduled take-off … if in fact the plane will take off at its (unlikely) scheduled departure.<br /><br />Before you get to the desk … and admit it …everyone does this … you size up your fellow travelers to see if you can play “spot the terrorist.” A quick scan of the mob and you’ve identified 12 turbans, at least half a dozen broken English speakers and three bearded guys who just look wrong.<br /><br />And that’s just the airport staff. Go through Heathrow Airport’s passport control sometime and you’ll think you just landed in Mumbai. The guy checking your passport to see if you can legally enter the United Kingdom, looks about as British as a sun tan. They’ve got enough Indians running the joint to open their own tech support hotline.<br /><br />Now once you reached the desk and found your ticket and your passport, you begin to sweat the thought of being overweight (in terms of baggage allowance I mean).<br /><br /><br /></span><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/luggage.2.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/luggage.2.jpg" border="0" /></span></a></p><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">IF your bags are over the arbitrary (from airline-to-airline) weight allowance, you must pay a penalty per pound (or more likely per kilo). The logic behind this (the airlines tell us) is that excess weight requires excess fuel to fly the plane … and that costs money. But go ahead and try to ask them for a rebate for each kilo if your bag is UNDERweight. Shouldn’t the same logic apply? Less weight, less fuel, less money?<br /><br />Keep in mind that the same baggage weight is offered to a 98 lb. woman that a 350 lb. man is also allowed. Doesn’t the combined weight of passenger AND luggage affect the required fuel? Or do the plane’s engines somehow know how to distinguish passenger weight from baggage weight?<br /><br />And really, what does it matter what my bags way in relation to the cost of the fuel on the flight which I will board, when there’s every chance my bags will be on a different plane with a different (usually better) destination anyway?<br /><br />I propose that they weight the passenger with his/her luggage, though I suppose many women would just flat out refuse to fly if this were the case.<br /><br />But since they don’t weigh the passengers, whenever I fly and know I am going to be close to the weight allowance, I try to wear as much of my clothes as possible … and stuff my pockets with all the heaviest small items. They also rarely weigh carryon-on (which if I am not mistaken …goes on the same plane that they are so bloody concerned about the weight-to-fuel ratio). So stuff that with your heavy stuff too!<br /><br />Then once you get through the metal detectors, just unload all your pockets into your carry-on.<br /><br /></span><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/metal%20detect.0.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/metal%20detect.0.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br />Another way to beat the system is to remember although they have tight weight restrictions to your luggage … that with the possible of exception of (some) carry-on … there are virtually no restrictions on the volume or size of your bags. So you can take a couple of really long bags …say the kind that pole vaulters would tote their equipment in …. sew them together … and you’ve created a bag so long, that it can’t all fit on the bag weigher machine in one go.<br /><br />Don’t even get me started on those ridiculous security questions!<br /><br />The airlines are completely insensitive towards people’s fear of flying. This is primarily because people do not fear flying. They fear crashing. And the insensitivity begins at the check-in desk.<br /><br />“Will Phoenix be your final destination?”<br /><br /><em>“Well that all depends on the skill of your pilots now doesn’t it?”</em><br /><br /></span><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/SmilingPilots.9.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="WIDTH: 302px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 231px" height="184" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/SmilingPilots.4.jpg" width="450" border="0" /></span></a></p><p align="left"><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:130%;">“Final Call” “Final Boarding” “Final Approach”<br /><br />Everything sounds so final in airline speak, that I am always concerned that my pilot is just a little too anxious to meet Allah.<br /><br />I saw a documentary recently about 911. They showed how the hijackers took over the cockpit and then immediately switched off the transponders. The transponders are the instruments that send information about the planes speed and altitude to air traffic control.<br /><br />With them switched off, the plane can still be tracked on radar but the control towers will have no clue as to how high (or low) and how fast (or slow) the plane is traveling. All this begs one simple question – which the documentary failed to ask mind you – WHY and under WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES would a pilot WANT to be able to switch off the transponder? Why was that even an option?<br /><br />OK … well I could go on but instead …. I offer you my …</span><br /><br /><span style="font-size:180%;"><strong>Top 30 ways to make airline travel a little more fun</strong><br /></span><br /></span></p><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>30)</strong> If flying to a warm weather destination, board the plane wearing a fur parka, scarf, mittens, ski trousers etc. When the pilot welcomes you aboard on the PA system, on your flight to where ever, stand up and shout, "Miami? SHIT WRONG PLANE!"</span></div><div align="left"><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>29)</strong> Half way to your destination, stand up and point out the window, desperately screaming in some made-up language. "DOWWA DA KABUNGA! DOWWA DA KABUNGA!"</span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>28)</strong> If the pilot apologises for delays on the PA system, BOO loudly.</span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>27)</strong> Present passport control home-made passport from cardboard and paper and a drawing of yourself for the picture, On the cover of this passport, make up the name of the nation you are from (EX: Flogmikistan) and say you own your own island which is technically an indepedent country.</span></div><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/passport%20control.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/passport%20control.jpg" border="0" /></span></a></p><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>26) </strong>Use a coleman cooler as your carry-on. Write on the side of it (in big letters) "HUMAN HEAD"</span></div><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/coleman1.gif"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/coleman1.gif" border="0" /></span></a></p><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>25)</strong> If you’re a black woman, check in using a white man’s passport. Keep a straight face as they look at you and at the picture in “your” passport … maybe drum your fingers on the desk impatiently and ask, “Is there a problem?”<br /><br /><strong>24)</strong> Wear a full suit of armor, chain mail, two fistful of rings, a few body piercings, wrap your legs in aluminum foil and wear a set of about 300 keys on a janitor’s key ring dangling from your side. Get in line for the metal detector and walk through without taking anything off or putting anything in the little plastic basket. When they stop you, say, “Oh wait” …then take off your watch and start as if you’re going back to walk through again.<br /><br /><strong>23)</strong> Wear a pilot’s uniform and carry a blind man’s white cane in one hand and an open bottle of Jack Daniels in the other. Walk around the airport bumping into travelers and ask them. “Will you be flying with me today?”<br /><br /><strong>22)</strong> Board your plane holding a large clipboard. On the clipboard have a stack of paper … the top page of which says (in very large letters) “FAA - AIR CRASH STATISTICS ANALYSIS” Laugh loudly and frequently. Feel all around the door opening as you enter and act like you’re jotting some notes on your clipboard.<br /><br /><strong>21)</strong> Bring a coffin with you to the check in desk and insist you can fit it in the overhead compartment.<br /><br /><strong>20)</strong> Sit at the gate reading a book. Cover the book first with a book cover that says, “Home Made Bombs for Dummies”<br /><br /><strong>19)</strong> When an airline goes on strike (and they all do) …go down to the airport when the stews are coming in to get their last paycheques. Stand at the door as they leave and say, “Bye-bye…bye-bye, bye-bye, bye-bye, bye-bye, bye-bye ….”<br /><br /><strong>18)</strong> Dress as a priest. When you check in and they ask about seating preferences, ask, “Are there any unaccompanied young boys traveling today?”<br /><br /><strong>17)</strong> If there is a long queue for the toilets aboard the plane, stand in the queue making loud straining noises …. They say … “Ahhhhhhh ….Never mind” and sit back down.<br /><br /><strong>16)</strong> Wear a tuxedo and a chauffeur’s cap and stand with the rest of the chauffeurs at the arrivals gate. Hold a sign that says either, “His Holiness” … “U. Bin Laden” “DB Cooper” … or my personal favorite: “Any young girl with big tits who needs a lift” </span></div><div align="left"><br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/limo4binladen.0.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/limo4binladen.0.jpg" border="0" /></span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><strong></strong></span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>15)</strong> In mid-flight …stand and bend to look out the window …then scream …throw yourself to the floor and get up saying, “THAT was close!”<br /><br /><strong>14)</strong> Once on board, sit in your seat reading a copy of the Koran …whilst moving your lips as if praying. Take out a copy of your life insurance papers from your jacket and place it on your tray table then blast Cat Stevens’ music through your headphones.<br /><br /><strong>13)</strong> Take a LOT of notes during the pre-flight safety pantomime. Immediately afterwards, raise your hands and ask a lot of questions about things like the lifeboat seating capacity, can asthma sufferers make use of the drop-down oxygen masks? Can you demonstrate how to use my seat belt again?<br /><br /><strong>12)</strong> If you get to your seat before anyone else has arrived who will be sitting next to you …crazy glue his seat belt in the locked position.<br /><br /><strong>11)</strong> During the flight, go into the toilets and come out wearing a superman costume.<br /><br /><strong>10)</strong> If by chance, the check-in girl says you will be sitting in seat number C4 …just chuckle an evil chuckle and with a smug grin say, “how ironic.”<br /><br /><strong>9)</strong> Wear a t-shirt that says “Future Mile High Club Member” and hang out by the toilets the whole flight. When a member of the opposite sex comes to the toilets, send them an inquisitive, inviting glance, motioning your head downward towards your t-shirt.<br /><br /><strong>8)</strong> During an overnight flight, pretend to sleepwalk throughout the cabin. Do it zombie-like style … you know …with your arms outstretched in front of you,<br /><br /><strong>7)</strong> Stand in the queue for the on-board toilet, holding a copy of Hustler magazine in one hand, and a box of tissues in the other. Groan loudly while in the toilet and be sure to leave behind an opened condom packet by the sink.<br /><br /><strong>6)</strong> Whisper to the person in the next seat that you’re going to highjack the plane and take it to … (<em>where ever the plane was headed to anyway</em>).<br /><br /><strong>5)</strong> When the stewardess comes around to collect the trash, hand her your empty bag of peanuts. Ask her, “Excuse me, were any nut products used in this item?” Then begin convulsing violently to the floor<br /><br /><strong>4)</strong> If flying with a group, spontaneously begin doing the Macarena or the Electric Slide whilst in line for passport control. Act as if you don’t know each other. Have just two people start if off and the others join in randomly.<br /><br /><strong>3)</strong> No matter what line of work you’re in …walk behind the stewardess as she is wheeling the duty free trolley down the aisle. When she finishes offering her wares to one row, immediately hand out business cards to that row and offer YOUR services or products. “Hi I was just wondering if you have enough home-owner’s insurance!” (You have a captive audience – take advantage of that)<br /><br /><strong>2)</strong> Again, if flying with a group …try not to get your seats assigned all in the same part of the plane. Instead …sit scattered throughout the plane. And for the ENITRE length of the flight… each member of the group should loudly participate in a game of “MARCO” – “POLO”<br /><br /><strong>1)</strong> Laugh loudly and hysterically during the in-flight movie – especially when inappropriate – like if they are showing “Schindler’s List” for example.</span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></div><p align="center"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/slutvirgin.jpg"><span style="font-family:arial;"><img style="WIDTH: 347px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 204px" height="131" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/200/slutvirgin.jpg" width="347" border="0" /></span></a></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">Don't Agree? Get your own blog!</div>NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.com15tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16568632.post-1126411409765332472005-01-24T00:03:00.000-05:002007-01-23T22:51:40.830-05:00LICENSED TO WATCH TV?<div align="justify"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/sean%20c%20007%20tv4.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left;" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/sean%20c%20007%20tv4.jpg" border="0" /></a>Having just returned to America after living in England for the past five years, I want to share something that not many Americans realize about our British cousins.<br /><br />We all know the stereotypes …. Bad teeth, worse weather, tea addiction, driving on the wrong side of the road, horrible “cuisine”, etc.<br /><br />But the thing that baffled me most, the entire time I was there was that every single British person is required by law to pay for a license …<strong>to watch television!</strong><br /><br />The cost is roughly ₤109 (about $200 US Dollars) a year. But if you fail to pay it and they are very good at intimidating you … the fine can be ₤1,000 (approx $1,840), plus they’ll embarrass you by publishing your name on the non-license-payers list.<br /><br />There are some (bizarre) exemptions. Firstly if a person is 75 years old (or older), it is free, Well not really free; the government (IE, the tax payer, who already pays his own TV license) subsidizes each and every one of these seniors (“Old Age Pensioners” or “OAPs”).<br /><br />Life expectancy in Britain is about 76 years for women and 71 years for men.<br /><br /><strong>BLIND INJUSTICE</strong> <a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/David%20Blunkett%20with%20Tony%20Blair.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right;" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/David%20Blunkett%20with%20Tony%20Blair.jpg" border="0" /></a><br />The most laughable exemption though is for the blind. If you are blind and live in Britain you only have to pay 50% of the cost. How nice. If you are blind, your TV is a f***ing radio!<br /><br />The one man who could change this and give the blind a full 100% discount? Well that would be the Home Secretary David Blunkett who is himself, blind!<br /><br />There are no exemptions for the deaf. Though if you are deaf AND blind, you’re TV is a f***ing table!<br /><br />So before you start stockpiling canned goods and rifle shells because you think the American government is too intrusive, stop and consider what’s been going on in the U.K. since ..Well since the invention of television.<br /><br />The British government, under the auspices of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), has been requiring licenses even before television. That’s right, before television, listeners of radio were required to be licensed.<br /><br />In fact the radio license continued long after the advent of television and was only abolished in 1971. Keep in mind that until the early 1970s, Britain did not have commercial radio stations to compete with the various BBC radio stations.<br /><br />Now don’t go panicking if you’re planning a vacation to London. Your hotel or rented accommodation is responsible for having the license. The rule of thumb is that every TV that is used must be licensed. I say “used” because in theory, you could own a TV but not watch it, or it could be broken, and you would not have to pay for that one.<br /><br />In most cases, it is the owner of the TV that must pay for the license. However that is not always the case. One nice thing about Britain is that a very high percentage of rented houses and apartments (flats) that are pre-furnished. This does not always include a TV. But the first flat I rented in London did have a TV; however the lease clearly stated that I was the one legally responsible to pay for the TV license.<br /><br />The cost of the license is not back breaking. But still, the principle of the matter … having to pay to watch regular, “through-the-air” TV goes against everything we as Americans believe in …the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And what brings more happiness to more Americans than television?<br /><br />A single license can cover a household if you have more than one television set. And there is no test required to get your license….though it would be fun if they had one. …<br /><br /><em>Question 17) Who played Manuel, the clueless Spanish waiter, on Fawlty Towers?<br /><br />a) Andrew Sachs<br />b) Peter Cooke<br />c) Lawrence Olivier<br />d) Nicholas Lyndhurst</em><br /><br />Here is the rub. All the money raised by these licensing fees goes to the BBC, regardless of whether you watch the BBC or not. British television is almost exclusively national. There are very few regional stations, and even fewer regional television viewers.<br /><br />Until the 1970s, there were only TWO ...count ‘em … TWO television stations in Britain. They were BBC1 and BBC2. To this day, you might hear an Englishman ask, “what’s on the other side?” This question means, “what else is on?” but goes back to when there were just a pair of British Channels (not counting the non-television one that idiots attempt to swim across every once in a while).<br /><br />Since then, they have added BBC3 and BBC 4, which are digital and therefore not received by the vast majority of “terrestrial” viewers. There are three main independent (national) stations which receive no funding from the TV licensing. They are known as ITV (Independent TV), Channel 4, and (launched about 8 years ago) Channel 5.<br /><br />Being charged whether you watch the BBC or not, just because you own a TV would be the same as … well let’s say you did away with toll roads but instead just charged everyone who owned a car a “road tax” regardless of whether they used their car every day on the motorways (the main thoroughfares – that should be toll roads) or whether they just kept their car in the garage and ventured out on the back roads once a week to get the groceries.<br /><br />Oh wait …the British do that too. They call it, “the road tax.”<br /><br />Incidentally, there is talk of adding tolls on those motorways, in addition to collecting the road tax. Perhaps some things never change; as this American’s single biggest grievance with the British was the tax burden I faced. Unlike in America, where the practice is to put prices on items that do not include the sales tax, the British (and most European countries) include the tax on the price sticker of everything.<br /><br />At first it seems like a good idea; makes it easier to calculate a more exact running total of items purchased. However, it serves to hide the fact that the price includes a whopping 17.5% sales tax (called the VAT, or value added tax). To be fair, all of Western Europe uses some form of VAT and in Scandinavia for example, the VAT is more in the neighborhood of 25%!<br /><br />I couldn’t vote in their elections while I was there of course. So for me, it was “taxation without representation.”<br /><br />Many Brits refer to the TV licensing fee as the “TV tax.”<br /><br />While I was living in England, I subscribed to a digital satellite service called SKY TV. SKY is immensely popular, offering the five main channels plus a host of sports and other channels (MTV Europe for example). Most of these channels, as in America, serve to prove that more channels thins the talent pool of writers and director and actors and original thoughts. So they are filled by cookery, house make-overs, people make-overs, and a ton of “reality” crap.<br /><br />But my license fee was not covered as part of my Sky subscription. Oh no. I still had to pay that.<br /><br /><strong>TIME TO DIGRESS</strong><br />By the way, in many cases we can blame the British for the (perceived) popularity of this mindless drivel of (non)reality programming. They were the ones behind American Idol, which started in Britain as “Pop Idol” and they have there own versions of “Survivor”, “Big Brother” etc.<br /><br />I say “perceived” because the only reason these programs, which pander to the lowest common denominator are watched is that that is what is offered. I don’t hold that people would watch German Opera if that’s all that was on, but surely the country that gave is Monty Python, Benny Hill, Fawlty Towers, and The Office etc. could produce something a tad more intellectual than “Wife Swap,” which is not as titillating as it sounds. It’s just one poor sod living with someone else’s nag machine for a week.<br /><br />And I say “non-reality” because I hold that nobody acts the same as they do IN reality when they know there is a camera on them and when they are chosen for, and being goaded to be, outrageous, loud, brash and ‘naughty’.<br /><br />But you know what? Reality television could be the topic of several future blogs, so I will leave it there for now.<br /><br />So the BBC does not air commercials (other than its own promos for its own programming – aired between programs) and has no need to since it’s cash cow, the TV license does not seem to be going away any time soon.<br /><br />Commercials are left for the independent and satellite/cable/digital stations. And speaking of which, in a few years time, ALL British television will be broadcast in digital mode only, making analog sets obsolete. So in essence, you will have to soon (and are encouraged now by the British Government) purchase either a digital TV or digital receiver box, or subscribe to a digital service (like SKY) in order to see any television at all in the future.<br /><br />This means that our British friends are being forced to invest in digital, and as a by-product, in getting more choices than just the BBC, yet at the same time, continue to pay for the license which still goes just to the BBC coffers. And those coffers are huge.<br /><br />High-ranking BBC executives, often with “Lord” or “Sir” before their names, are paid enormous sums of money. These upper tier executives are allowed and encouraged to take a sabbatical in which they take a paying job outside the BBC in any field of their choice and receive their BBC salary at the same time. So Johnny Britain is paying these execs, through their licensing fees, while they are also earning an income as teachers, plumbers, UN weapons inspectors, whatever. The “thinking” (?) behind this is to bring new experiences into the creative realm of the BBC. Why don’t they just hire plumbers and teachers and weapons inspectors in the first place?<br /><br />The BBC’s (strong) arm, The “TV Licensing Agency … the TVLA,” uses whatever means at its disposal necessary to keep the coffers filled … most of which involve intimidation and threats.<br /><br />They cite a database of over 28 million home and business addresses, telling them which have TV Licenses.<br /><br /><em>“All of our enforcement officers have access to this database and will check whether or not you have a license. If you are using a TV and are unlicensed, you could face prosecution and a hefty fine.”-- TVLA</em><br /><br />But of course, the TVLA’s greatest threat remains the “TV Detector Van.” The debate on whether these vans are a product of science fiction or real … perhaps developed by “Q - Division” … remains to this day a divided question.<br /><br /><em>“We have a fleet of detector vans, plus, our enforcement officers have access to hand-held detection devices capable of detecting a magnetic field when a TV is switched on. In fact, we catch an average of over 1,000 people watching TV without a license every day.” – TVLA</em><br /><br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/1600/tv_detector_van_50s.4.jpg"><img style="" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4494/1576/320/tv_detector_van_50s.4.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><strong><span style="font-size:78%;">The BBC / TVLA utilizes the LATEST science to catch illegal viewers.</span></strong><br /><br />EVEN if these things actually worked, I suggest that those least likley to pay the fee are those who can’t afford it. And those would include people who live in council blocks (Public Housing Towers) where a couple of hundred families with a couple hundred TVs might be living on top of, below, and all around each other. Good luck with that.<br /><br />Too bad the British can’t invent an illegal alien detector van … or extremist/terrorist detector van …two things for which the British people would have greater need and appreciation.<br /><br />So why do people pay this ridiculous fee?<br /><br />Because everyone else does I guess. There are various small and vocal subversive groups who realize that if EVERYONE just refused to pay it, the government and the BBC would have no recourse. But so far, they’ve never been able to successfully enlist a significant number of rebel-minded viewers.<br /><br />[The Following is From: www.bbcresistance.co.uk]<br /><br /><em>"We can detect a TV in use, in any area. That's because every TV contains a component called the 'local oscillator', which emits a signal when the television is switched on. It's this signal that the external aerials on our vans pick up." It also states that hand-held scanner are used to locate television sets in hard to reach places.” -- TVLA</em><br /><br />In addition to the “real” detector vans there are a number of deceptor vans, making people feel guilty and to have them buy a TV licence when they spot the van.<br /><br />Despite all of the expensive gadgets developed by BBC R&D detection of TV Licence evasion depends heavily on an address based system [database called "Lassy"], so if you're not on their supposedly exhaustive list, they nip round, listen really carefully at the door and bust you if they hear Anne Robinson's voice.<br /><br />Another way of telling someone has got a TV is by aerial spotting. Apparently there is this story about a tv detector man claiming someone had a tv because of the aerial, the man then replied "just cos' I've got milk on me door step doesn't mean I've got a cow."<br /><br />In addition to the Lassy database, the TVLA/Capita has a database called the Campaign Management Data Warehouse [CMDW]. The CMDW holds records of recent "customer" contacts and demographic information on Postcodes, obtained from third parties. This information is held and used for the purpose of segmentation of mailing activity. For example if a certain postcode is likely to contain student residences, then a special targeted letter, might be mailed to address in the postcode area.<br /><br />Then again...<br /><br />The National Audit Office Report of May 2002 states the following on detector vans: "the BBC is introducing new detector vans with enhanced capabilities to detect when a television is in use. This will make it easier for enquiry officers to establish that an offence is likely to be taking place, although they will still need to secure further evidence for successful prosecution. Detection equipment has been used in conjunction with targeted advertising to act as a visible deterrent."In other words: detection-evidence only is not good enough for conviction.<br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);"><strong>If ANYONE who reads this knows from personal experience, ANYONE who has been caught by one of these hi-tech marvels, I’d like to hear about it … so please feel free to comment with your story.</strong></span></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">Don't Agree? Get your own blog!</div>NewKidOnTheBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12617158046279258398noreply@blogger.com9